Features of Judicial Control when Selecting a Measure of Prevention in the Form of House Arrest

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article analyzes current issues and problems of implementing judicial control when choosing a preventive measure in the form of house arrest. Particular attention is paid to the judicial practice that has developed in the application of this type of judicial control. The advantages of house arrest over other preventive measures are noted. In addition, the author puts forward proposals for improving the institution of house arrest.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Ramil Mamedov

Kuban State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ramilmamedov90@mail.ru
Código SPIN: 9602-3454

Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof. of Criminal Procedure

Rússia, Krasnodar

Bibliografia

  1. Germevsky Yu. R. Judicial jurisdiction in the sphere of application of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Russian Justice. 2021. No. 1 (In Rus).
  2. Larkina E.V. A new preventive measure—a ban on certain actions. Criminal Law. 2018. No. 4 (In Rus.).
  3. Nazyrova N. A. Problems of alternative measures of restraint in the form of detention. Alley of Science. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 4 (20). Pp. 715–718.(In Rus.).
  4. Advocacy in Russia: textbook for universities. [ Sergeev V.I. et al.]; V.I. Sergeeva (gen. ed.).; Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute—Ed. 4th, revised. and add. Moscow: Justicinform, 2011. 1006, [1] s.; ISBN 978-5-7205-1086-2.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar