Method of Legal Regulation and Turnover of Low-Rise Housing Stock in Russia

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Purpose of the study. This article is a continuation of the author’s study of the legal regime of low-rise housing stock in Russia. The purpose of the current study is to highlight the distinctive features of such features of the legal regime as the method of legal regulation of legal relations (imperative/dispositive) and the ability of objects to be circulated. Conclusions. The analysis showed that when considering these features of the legal regime in relation to the low-rise housing stock of Russia, the application of the principle of analogy of law is characteristic, expressed, in particular, in the complementary use of both imperative and dispositive methods of legal regulation. The study of the ability of objects to turn over as a sign of the legal regime made it possible to note the absence of clear distinguishable characteristics of low-rise housing stock, with the exception of the allocation of apartment buildings within the framework of social tenancy agreements into a separate category.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Assia Dmitrieva

Academy of Labor and Social Relations; Law Firm «Yurist», LLC

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: Arb89165575184@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0009-0007-5647-7173

postgraduate student of the Civil Law and Process Department, Member of the Russian Lawyers Association in Moscow, expert in Legislative and town planning commission, Duty lawyer at the Reception of the President of the Russian Federation for legal advice to the population, founder

 

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Anna Rabetz

National Research Tomsk State University

Email: rabecjur@mail.ru
Scopus Author ID: 417668

Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Leading Analyst of the Laboratory of Social and Legal Research of the Institute of Law

Rússia, Tomsk

Bibliografia

  1. Belov V. A. Civil law. General and Special parts. Moscow : Center of Law, 2003. 960 p.
  2. Belyaeva G.S. The concept of a legal regime in the theory of law: basic approaches // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2012. No. 5 (87). Pp. 26-31.
  3. Belyaeva G.S. Legal regimes based on restrictions: towards the definition of the concept // Law and politics. 2015. No. 8 (188). Pp. 1141-1149.
  4. Bespalov Y.F. On the issue of the legal regime of residential premises as an object of civil and housing rights // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2016. No. 8. Pp. 41-44.
  5. Vinichenko Yu. V. Turnover and legal regime of objects of civil rights: the relationship of concepts // Proceedings of the Baikal State University. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 116-120.
  6. Gorshenev V. M. Methods and organizational forms of legal regulation in a socialist society. M.: Legal literature, 1972. 258 p.
  7. Dmitrieva A.A. The legal regime of low-rise housing stock in Russia // Family and housing law. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 25-28.
  8. Efimova O.V., Svirin Y.A., Shagieva R.V. Real estate in civil law and transactions with it: monograph. Prometheus, 2021. 526 p.
  9. Karyagin N.E. Dispositive and imperative norms in housing law: issues of theory and practice of application // Problems of economics and legal practice. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 42-46.
  10. Kornilova U.V. The concept of limiting the turnover of land plots // Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 40-52.
  11. Krassov O.I. The right of private ownership of land. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2015. 280 p.
  12. Kryukova E.S. Features of the legal regime of residential premises in the houses of the social service system of citizens // Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series: Law. 2016. No. 1-2 (18). Pp. 124-128.
  13. Petrov D.E. Method and method of legal regulation: issues of correlation // News of higher educational institutions. Volga region. 2016. No. 1 (37). Pp. 37-42.
  14. Podshivalov T. P. The object of civil rights and the legal regime: the problem of definition // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law. 2013. No. 13 (3). Pp. 49-54.
  15. Rozhkova M. A. Turnover of objects of civil rights // Law. 2009. No. 3. Pp. 212-218.
  16. Rozhkova O.A., Voronina S.V. Turnover of land plots as objects of civil rights // Russian-Asian Legal Journal. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 30-35.
  17. Sukhanov E.V. Civil law. Vol. 1. M., Statute, 2002. 720 p.
  18. Ulezko A. Yu. The legal regime of immovable property // Agrarian and land law. 2022. No. 11(215). Pp. 128-129.
  19. Fedotova M.A. Assessment for collateral purposes: theory, practice, recommendations. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2018. 246 p.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies