Legal meaning of the «age» category in criminal law


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

According to the author, differentiation of criminal responsibility is one of the priority directions of criminal policy of any state. It is the feature characterizing an individual that is one of the grounds taken by the legislator as differentiating. Age as an inseparable attribute in criminal law plays a huge role. This fact is natural - it is impossible to recognize any sane natural person as a subject of crime. This person must correspond to the age from which it is possible to bring criminal proceedings. The basis for determining age is the level of consciousness, the ability of a person to be aware of what is happening and to act sensibly in accordance with it. A human being cannot immediately after his birth understand all the actions and deeds being performed, let alone the consequences of his actions. This ability does not appear instantly; it develops during life and is formed when a person reaches a certain age. However, this does not happen for everyone. Article 20 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Russian Criminal Code) states that a person who has reached the age of sixteen at the time of committing the crime will be subject to criminal liability. Part 2 of the same article specifies the list of crimes for which a person can be held liable from the age of fourteen. This highlights the problem of sanity. A person may be held criminally liable if he or she has not only reached a certain age, but also his or her mental capacity corresponds to that age.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Ruslan Abidov

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: abidovv27@mail.ru
lecturer of the Department of fire training Nalchik, Russia

参考

  1. О внесении изменений в Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации: федеральный закон от 27 июля 2009 г. № 215-ФЗ // Доступ из СПС «Консультант Плюс».
  2. Алешин, Н.И. Уголовная ответственность несовершеннолетних в Российской Федерации /Н.И. Алешин, Е.С. Шуба // Сборник трудов конференции «Актуальные проблемы управления и права в XXI веке: теория и практика». - М., 2016. С. 44-47.
  3. Кругликов, Л.Л. Понятие, основания и виды дифференциации ответственности за преступления и иные правонарушения /Л.Л. Кругликов // Lex russica. - 2014. - № 3. - С. 305-313.
  4. Российское уголовное право: Общая часть. Курс лекций: В 2-х томах. Т. 1 / Наумов А.В. - 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: Юрид. лит., 2008. 496 с.
  5. Лапшин, В.Ф. Социальная природа оснований дифференциации ответственности /В.Ф. Лапшин. Вестник академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации. 2009. № 14. С. 13-14
  6. Назаренко, Г.В. Отставание в психическом развитии как основание, исключающее ответственность лица, достигшего возраста уголовной ответственности Г.В. Назаренко. Известия Юго-западного государственного университета (Курск). 2016. № 1(64). С. 157.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML