Construction of the Eurasian Symbolic System in the Context of Disintegration/Integration and Disconnection/Connection with the Soviet Symbols

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The author offers the symbolic approach to understanding the nature of the construction of the Eurasian identity in the framework of the EAEU as the result of (dis-)integration and (dis-)connection with the Soviet symbols. The goal of the research is to provide the interdisciplinary analysis of shaping the EAEU’s symbolic identity. The symbolic and dialectic approaches are used. The main idea consists in the suggestion that the symbols are social technology of creating EAEU’s identity. The article argues that EAEU’s symbolic system is shaping on the logic of (dis-)connection and (dis)integration with the meanings of the symbolic system of the USSR. The dialectic logic of integration and connection means greater interaction of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Russia. A logic of history of integration and connection is determined on the attempt to revive the Soviet symbols which can be the basis for the construction of common symbolic system. The inner strength of such integrative process lies in the fact that the new phenomenon of the EAEU is not seeking the reincarnation of the old symbols of the Soviet era, serving the expression of utopian ideas. The key findings of the research can be the basis for the practical recommendations in terms of the Eurasian cultural policy.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Julia Ten

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ypten@fa.ru
Dr. Sci. (Philos.); Professor at the Department of Management and Innovation of the Faculty of Higher School of Management; associate professor Moscow, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Arutyunyan Yu.V. Transformation of post-Soviet nations. Based on the materials of ethnosociological studies. Moscow: Nauka, 2003. (In Rus.)
  2. Atanov N.I. Russian-Eurasian transit in the economic zone of the Great Silk Road. Problems of Economic Transition. 2018. Vol. 60, No. 1-3. Pp. 210-219.
  3. Bajdurin M.S. Baidurin M.S. Ensuring economic security of the EAEU on the basis of the development of economic integration of the CIS countries. PhD Theses dis. ... Dr. Sci. (Econ.). Moscow, 2017.
  4. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and Simulation. University of Michigan Press, 1981. 164 p.
  5. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California press, 1969.
  6. Bottici C., Challand B. Imagining Europe: Myth, memory, and identity. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 224 p.
  7. Barthes R. Rhetoric of the image. Image - Music - Text. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.
  8. Bruter M. On what citizens mean by feeling “European”: Perceptions of news, symbols and borderless-ness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2003. No. 30 (1). Pp. 21-39.
  9. Cassirer E. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Vol. 1: Language. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955.
  10. Charon J.M. Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. New York, 1979. 323 p.
  11. Chebankova E. Russia’s idea of the multipolar world order: Origins and main dimensions. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2017. Vol. 33. No. 3. Pp. 217-234.
  12. Deleuze G. The logic of sense. Columbia University Press, 1990.
  13. Dzarasov R.S. Russian neo-revisionist strategy and the Eurasian project. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 1-16.
  14. Evgeneva T.V., Selezneva A.V. Soviet past in the value and figurative-symbolic space of Russian identity. Polis. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 25-39. (In Rus.)
  15. Fornäs J. Signifying Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. 353 p.
  16. Fedorenko V. Eurasian integration: Effects on Central Asia. Washington: Rethink Institute, 2015.
  17. Foret F. Symbolic dimensions of EU legitimization. Media, Culture and Society. 2009. No. 31 (2). Pp. 9-14.
  18. Golam M., Monowar M. Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 163-172.
  19. Gordienko D. The Strategy of the Silk Road economic belt and ensuring Russia’s economic security. Problems of Economic Transition. 2019. Vol. 61. Pp. 354-376.
  20. Habermas J. Making sense of the EU - toward a cosmopolitan Europe. Journal of Democracy. 2003. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 86-100.
  21. Hall S. The work of representation/presentation. In: Cultural representations and signifying practices. S. Hall (ed.). London: Sage, 1997. Pp. 13-74.
  22. Karaganov S. The new Cold War and the emerging Greater Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 85-93.
  23. Kirkham K. The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2016. No. 7. Pp. 111-128.
  24. Knobel’ A. The Eurasian Economic Union: Development prospects and possible obstacles. Problems of Economic Transition. 2017. Vol. 90. Pp. 335-360.
  25. Kolstш P. Strategies of symbolic Nation-building in South Eastern Europe. Routledge, 2016. 300 p.
  26. Laffan B. The politics of identity and political order in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. 1996. Vol. 34. No. 1. Pp. 81-102.
  27. Li Y. The greater Eurasian partnership and the Belt and Road initiative: Can the two be linked? Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 94-99.
  28. Lotman J.M. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London & New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, 1990.
  29. Lukin A. Russia’s pivot to Asia: Myth or reality? Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40 (6). Pp. 573-589.
  30. Lukin A. Russia in a post-bipolar world: Survival. Global Politics and Strategy. 2016. No. 58 (1). Pp. 91-112.
  31. Lukin A., Yakunin V. Eurasian integration and the development of Asiatic Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 100-113.
  32. Malinova O. Actual past: The symbolic policy of the ruling elite and the dilemma of Russian identity. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia , 2015.
  33. Manners I.J. Symbolism in European integration. Comparative European Politics. 2011. No. 9 (3). Pp. 243-268.
  34. Marquardt K.L. Identity, social mobility and ethnic mobilization: Language and the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Comparative Political Studies. 2017. Vol. 51 (7). Pp. 831-867.
  35. Mozaffari M. Globalization and Civilizations. London: Routledge, 2003.
  36. Rotaru V. The Eurasian Economic Union - a sustainable alternative for the former soviet space? Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2018. Vol. 26 (4). Pp. 425-442.
  37. Sergi B.S. Putin’s and Russian-led European Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-poltical “Janus Biifrons”. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 52-60.
  38. Shengler O. The decline of the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  39. Theiler T. Political symbolism and European integration. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.
  40. Ten Yu.P. The shaping of a symbolic model of the Eurasian economic union as basis for marketing strategy. Humanities and Socio-economic Sciences. 2017. No. 3 (94). С. 110-113. (In Rus.)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>