Gender Aspects in Art and Religion from the Point of View of N. Luhmann’s System Theory


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article discusses the possibility of applying the theory of autopoietic communication systems to the scientific description of issues of gender differences. The proposed theory can act as a metatheoretical level of consideration of the topic and allows using the position of the observer of the “second order”, directs the focus of attention to the differences verbalized in communication, reveals the observing system based on the involved code. The specificity of gender aspects in the functioning and self-description of the systems of art and religion presented in the discourses “patriarchal bias” and “scholarly bias” is indicated. Gender differences as a topic of communication often actualize the systemic codes of political, legal and moral systems. They represent one of the forms of monitoring the fulfillment of freedom and equality, critically observe the availability of universal inclusion in systemic communications, including in the systems of religion and art, when success within the systems is governed by specific codes and programs, but not by gender differences. A positive strategy is demonstrated for replenishing self-descriptions of systems of religion and art, including the “absent presence” of women in the memory of systems, making the contribution of women to systemic autopoiesis “visible”.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Maria Liutaeva

Vladimir State University

Email: liutaeva@yandex.ru
Vladimir, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Barash R. (ed.). Systematic and communicative theory of the protest movement: Protest as “an alternative without an alternative”. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018. No. 3. Pp. 123-138. (In Rus.)
  2. Gabriel M. Ninth street women: Lee Krasner, Elaine de Kooning, Grace Hartigan, Joan Mitchell, and Helen Frankenthaler: Five painters and the movement that changed modern art. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber, 2020. 560 p.
  3. Kirilina A.V. Linguistic gender studies as a manifestation of episteme change in humanitarian knowledge. Bulletin of the Military University. 2010. No. 4 (24). Pp.110-114.
  4. Legoyda V. Do jeans interfere with salvation. The experience of modern apologetics. Мoscow: Trade House «Beliy Dom», 2007. 128 р.
  5. Luhmann N. Society of society. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Logos, 2011. 640 p.
  6. Luhmann N. Society of society. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Logos, 2011. 640 p.
  7. Mavrina T. Color is jubilant. Diaries. Sketches about art. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardia, 2006. 364 p.
  8. Petrakova A.S. The researching of the problem of personality’s identification and self-identification in communicative approach. Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences. 2017. No. 8-9. (In Rus.)
  9. Sukovataya V.A. Feminist theology and gender studies in religion: Prospects for a new spirituality. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2002. No. 4. Pp. 183-192. (In Rus.)
  10. Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R., Vetter E. Methods of text and discourse analysis. Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center, 2009. 356 p.
  11. Hodge S. Major women in art history. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber, 2021. 224 p.
  12. Gershon I. Seeing like a system: Luhmann for anthropologists. Anthropological Theory. 2005. No. 5 (2). Pp. 99-116.
  13. Hintz B. Niklas Luhmann, gender, queer. Soziologiemagazin // Publizieren Statt Archivieren. 2013. No. 6 (1). Pp. 45-56. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-387595
  14. Hayward S., Marshall K. Women, religion, and peacebuilding. Washington: United States Institute of Peace, 2015.
  15. Luhmann N. Die Religion der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2002. 364 S.
  16. McCutcheon R.T. Religion in 50 words: A critical vocabulary. London; New York: Routledge, 2021. 332 p.
  17. Perez C.C. Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. London: Chatto&Windus, Kindle Edition, 2019. Loc. 405.
  18. Weiss M.G. Non-dualistic sex. Josef Mitterer’s non-dualistic philosophy in the light of Judith Butler’s (de)constructivist feminism // Constructivist Foundations. 2013. No. 8 (2). Pp. 183-189. URL: http://constructivist.info/8/2/183
  19. Laqueur T.W. Making sex: Body and gender from the greeks to freud. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992. 313 p.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##