The concept of “the political”: content, scope, functions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Politics, state, government, bureaucracy, law, etc. as institutions, war, revolution, elections, lawmaking, etc. as processes, sociological polling, collection, storage, presentation and dissemination of information, digitalization, lobbying, corruption, etc. as technologies are hyponyms, that is, concepts expressing a private essence in relation to another, more general concept – hyperonym. Such a common concept for them is political. And a deep understanding of its meaning and content is the initial condition for their scientific research. Today, society has not developed a socially significant and generally accepted understanding of the political. In modern discourse, it has a fairly broad interpretation, characterized by multivariance and ambiguity. At the same time, its meaning and content are often deliberately and purposefully distorted and distorted. On this basis, they sometimes talk about politics as an extremely contradictory concept. The article presents an experience of operationalization of the concept of “political”. It offers the author’s definition of the political, reveals its originality, its relationship with politics and its role in understanding and describing the sphere of politics. An attempt is made to identify criteria of politicality, to reveal the content, scope and functions of the title concept.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Oleg A. Belkov

Zhirinovsky University of World Civilizations

Author for correspondence.
Email: belkovole@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 4328-2213

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; leading researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Badiou A. Meza/Politics: Is it possible to think politics? A short treatise on metapolitics. Moscow: Logos. 2005. 240 p.
  2. Danken J.-M. Political science. Moscow, 1993. 161 p.
  3. Clausewitz K. About the war. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow; St. Petersburg: AST; Terra Fantastica, 2002. 318 p.
  4. Kreveld M. Van. Transformation of war. Transl. from English. Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2005. 344 p.
  5. Lukyanov F. The geometry of safety. We are not in danger of a world war. She’s already coming. Military-industrial Courier. 2019. No. 14 (777). (In Rus.)
  6. Mayer H. Karl Schmitt, Leo Strauss and the “Concept of the political”. Moscow: Skimen, 2012. 191 p.
  7. Markov B.V. The concept of the political. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2007. 141 p.
  8. Hofmeister H. The will to war, or the Impotence of politics. Philosophical and political treatise. O.A. Koval (transl. from Germany, and afterword). St. Petersburg: Humanitarian Academy, 2006. 288 p.
  9. Novoselsky S.O., Moiseeva O.A., Filippova O.A. Communication policy of executive authorities with the population in social networks. Questions of Political Science. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 3 (91). Pp. 1001–1013. (In Rus.)
  10. Tsygankov A.M. Military-political aspects of the construction and development of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation at the present stage. Bulletin of the Academy of Military Sciences. 2019. No. 2 (67). Pp. 19–25. (In Rus.)
  11. Schmitt K. The concept of the political. Moscow: Engineer, 2011. 291 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML