The Historical Evolution of the Discourse on Mass Media in Political Science
- Авторлар: Miletsky V.P.1,2, Emelin Y.A.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- LETI Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University
- Шығарылым: Том 15, № 3 (2025)
- Беттер: 42-50
- Бөлім: Political Institutions, Processes and Technologies
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/687837
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-3-42-50
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RHOQEK
- ID: 687837
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
Political science, which has a unique methodological and rich empirical apparatus, has been formed without exaggeration for centuries, centuries. The periodization of the development of political science covers several historical milestones at once: Antiquity, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and the modern period. At each stage, positive knowledge was accumulated, systematized, and acquired the outlines of an autonomous theoretical science, which now has applied significance. Such thinkers and scientists as Plato, Cicero, Aristotle, Socrates, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Nicolo Machiavelli, John Milton, John Mill, Thomas More, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Karl Popper, etc. made an invaluable contribution to the formation and development of political science. The institutionalization of political science or political institutionalization itself is inextricably linked with the description and justification of the effectiveness and stability of political processes that take place in various political systems. Within the framework of structural and functional analysis, the key component of any political system is the mass media. Of course, in the usual sense, traditional media were formed and developed much later than the first thoughts about the state, its structure, the categories of freedom, justice, and separation of powers arose, but the conceptual and explanatory base that exists today was not formed immediately. Moreover, the theoretical, methodological, and empirical foundations of the study of mass media require a multi-paradigm approach. The purpose of this work is a theoretical and methodological interpretation of universal and general categories that correspond to the stated topic of this study, and are reflected at the theoretical and empirical levels of political science.
Толық мәтін

Авторлар туралы
Vladimir Miletsky
Saint Petersburg State University; LETI Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: falesm@mail.ru
SPIN-код: 2756-6273
Dr. Sci. (Polit.); Professor at the Department of Sociology of Political and Social Processes; Professor at the Department of Sociology and Political Sciences
Ресей, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgYaroslav Emelin
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: emelinyaroslav@yandex.ru
SPIN-код: 7518-3328
Postgraduate Student at the Department of Sociology and Political Sciences
Ресей, Saint PetersburgӘдебиет тізімі
- Aristotle. Politics. S. Zhebelev (transl. from Ancient Greek). Moscow: Eksmo, 2022. 384 p.
- Batygin G.S. Tolcott Parsons’ structural functionalism. Bulletin of the RUDN University. 2003. No. 4–5. Pp. 6–34. (In Rus.)
- Bentham I. Introduction to the foundations of morality and legislation. Moscow: ROSSPAN, 1998.
- Bodrunova S.S. Paradigms of “advocacy” and “arbitration” in Western journalistic ethics and their value-normative content. Sociology and Law. 2014. No. 1 (23). Pp. 16–23. (In Rus.)
- Hobbes T. Leviathan, or Matter, form and power of the church and civil state. Moscow: Mysl, 2001.
- Demyanenko N.V. Personal freedom and the integrity of the state in the sociological interpretation of G. Spencer. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. 2012. No. 2 (26). Pp. 21–27. (In Rus.)
- Kuzmina S.V. The role of the media in shaping the image of a politician. Proceedings of the Saratov University. 2012. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 69–72. (In Rus.)
- Miletskiy V.P., Emelin Ya.A. Towards a methodological basis the study of the Fourth Power as an institution of the political system within modern society. Discourse. 2024. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 75–85. (In Rus.). doi: 10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-3-75-85.
- Machiavelli N. The Sovereign. On the art of war. G. Muravyev (transl. from Italian). Moscow: AST, 2023.
- Markov K.V., Sivkina N.Yu. Political teachings of the ancient world. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University, 2017.
- Mill J. About freedom. Moscow: Urait, 2024.
- Mikhaylina S.A., Popov N.A. The Age of Enlightenment: The birth of new sciences. Economic and Socio-humanitarian Studies. 2023. No. 4 (40). Pp. 198–206. (In Rus.)
- More T. Utopia. V.P. Volgin (gen. ed.). A.I. Malein (transl. from Latin and com.). Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1935.
- Plato. The State. A.N. Egunova (transl. from Ancient Greek). D.S. Khaustov (intro). Moscow: RIPOLL classic, 2021.
- Popper K. Assumptions and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Translated from English. Moscow: AST; Ermak, 2004.
- Rousseau J.-J. On the social contract, Or the principles of political law. Moscow: Urait, 2023.
- Semenov A.V. Rethinking civil society: The normative concept of the public sphere by J. Habermas. Society and Power. 2009. No. 4. Pp. 9–13. (In Rus.)
- Sibert F., Schramm W., Peterson T. Four theories of the press. M. Polevaya (transl. from English). Moscow: National Institute of the Press; Vagrius, 1998.
- Titus L.K. On the nature of things. F. Petrovsky (transl. from Latin). Moscow: Art Literature, 1983.
- Cicero M.T. On the state. V.O. Gorenstein (transl. from Latin). Moscow: AST, 2022. 416 p.
Қосымша файлдар
