Financial Subjectivity as a Criterion for Assessing Financial Culture

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of the research. The article substantiates the methodological principles for assessing financial culture with the introduction of the key criterion “financial subjectivity”. The rationale for the importance of studying the financial culture of modern man, his place in the world of finance, the level of subjectivity is given. In the conceptual framework of the study, the definitions of economic culture, financial culture, subjectivity and financial subjectivity are considered with reference to the works of A. Smith, J. Akerlof, R. Schiller, M. Foucault, V.V. Radaev. The scientific novelty of the study is the introduction and substantiation of the concept of financial subjectivity - a completely new category in sociological and economic knowledge, which opens up opportunities for a person to proactively comprehend new circumstances, take more effective actions in times of uncertainty, as well as inclusion (rooting) in the financial culture of society and in the economic the system as a whole. Results. The author clarifies the concept of assessing financial culture as an individual’s ability to manage meanings, values and tools in financial situations in order to achieve goals and reduce the risks of uncertainty determined by the financial culture of a particular economic system. Proposals are presented for developing a system of criteria and indicators of financial culture with the inclusion in it of the criterion of financial subjectivity, expressing subjective values and the meanings that economic entities put into their daily financial activity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Diana A. Kunizheva

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: diana_kunizheva@mail.ru
postgraduate student; assistant at the Department of Sociology of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Akerlof J., Schiller R. Spiritus Animalis, or how human psychology controls the economy and why it is important for world capitalism. D. Priyatkina (transl. from English); A. Suvorov (ed.); S. Guriev (intro art.). Moscow: United Press LLC, 2010. P. 13.
  2. Benton R. Economics as a cultural system // Journal of Economic Issues. 1982. Vol. 16. No. 2. Pp. 461-469.
  3. Sedlacek T. Economics of good and evil. In search of the meaning of the economy from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 544 p.
  4. Bondarenko O.V. On the issue of definition of the notion of the culture of economic thinking // Образование через всю жизнь: непрерывное образование в интересах устойчивого развития. 2014. № 2. (In Eng.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/on-the-issue-of-definition-of-the-notion-of-the-culture-of-economic-thinking
  5. Giniyatullov R.D. Essence of economic culture and its main characteristics. PSE. 2018. No. 2 (66). (In Rus.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/suschnost-ekonomicheskoy-kultury-i-ee-osnovnye-harakteristiki
  6. Béres D., Huzdik K. A pénzügyi kultúra megjelenése makrogazdasági szinten. Pénzügyi Szemle. 2012. Vol. LVII. No. 3. Pp. 322-336.
  7. Süge Cs. A pénzügyi kultúra mérhetősége. In: Tompáné D.K., Miklós G. Tudományos mozaik 7. Második kötet. Kalocsa: Tomori Pál Főiskola.
  8. Csorba L. The determining factors of financial culture, financial literacy and financial behavior // Public Finance Quarterly. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 67-83.
  9. Aimaletdinov T.A. The role of the municipal information environment in shaping the financial culture of the population. In: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Sociological Congress. Moscow, 2008. URL: http://www.isras.ru/abstract_bank/1217593630.pdf
  10. Hegel G.W.F. Phenomenology of the Spirit. Series: Monuments of Philosophical Thought. Moscow: Nauka, 2000. Pp. 15, 17, 31, 296, 378, 446. URL: http://med-kirov.narod.ru/fil/gegel/Fenomenologija_dukha.pdf
  11. Makarova I.V. The origins of the concept of “subject” in Greek philosophy (Plato, Aristotle). Subjectivity and Identity. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2012. Ch. 1. Pp. 15-34. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/s2c25e9zmt/63806243.pdf
  12. Kant I. Criticism of the ability of judgment. Moscow: Art, 1994. C. 12. URL: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/istorija_nemeckaja_klassicheskaja/kant_i_kritika_sposobnosti_suzhdenija/12-1-0-2706
  13. Ananiev B.G. Selected psychological works: In 2 vols. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1980. 232 p.
  14. Blonsky P.P. Psychological essays. Moscow, 1927.
  15. Brushlinsky А.V. The problem of the subject in psychological science. Psychological Journal. 1996. Vol. 12. No. 6. Pp. 3-11. (In Rus.)
  16. Vygotsky L.S. Psychology of human development. Moscow: Publishing House of Meaning; Eksmo, 2005. 1136 p. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/vugotskiy-psc_razv_chel-1-soznanie_kak_problema_psc_i_povedeniya.pdf
  17. Rubinshtein S.L. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2002, 720 p. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/rubinshteyn=osnovu_obzhey_psc.pdf
  18. Leontiev A.N. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 1975. 130 p. URL: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/leontiev/1975/dyeatyelnost/deyatyelnost-soznyanie-lichnost.pdf
  19. Kravtsov G.G. Method L.S. Vygotsky. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Psychology. Pedagogy. Education. No. 2. 2015. P. 33. (In Rus.) URL: https://www.rsuh.ru/upload/main/vestnik/ppo/Vestnik_2_15.pdf#page=33
  20. Asmolov A.G. Psychology of personality: A cultural-historical understanding of human development. 3rd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Meaning; Publishing Center “Academy”, 2007. 526 p.
  21. Andreeva I.G. Professional subjectivity of future lawyers as an object of study and development. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities. 2009. No. 7. Pp. 186-191. (In Rus.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/professionalnaya-subektnost-buduschih-yuristov-kak-obekt-izucheniya-i-razvitiya
  22. Aksenova G.I., Kuptsov I.I., Aksenov A.N. Subject and education. Ryazan: RINFO, 2000. 97 p. ISBN 5-89885-001-5.
  23. Borytko N.M. Subjectivity as the leading idea of the humanization of education. Moscow: Center for Distance Education “Eidos”, 1998.
  24. Tyurikov A.G., Bolshunov A.Ya. Professional subjectivity as a product of higher education and approaches to assessing the professional subjectivity of a university graduate. Innovations in Education. 2018. No. 11. Pp. 105-114. (In Rus.)
  25. Foucault M. Hermeneutics of the subject: A course of lectures given at the College de France 1981-1982 academic year. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. 677 p.
  26. Bolshunov A.Ya., Bolshunova S.A., Ozerov A.A. Education as a practice of producing subjectivity in teacher-student communications. Innovations in Education. 2020. No. 6. p. 28-36. (In Rus.)
  27. What should be Russia in the view of the Russians? Levada Center. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2021/09/10/kakoj-dolzhna-byt-rossiya-v-predstavlenii-rossiyan/
  28. Radaev V.V. Economic sociology: textbook. Allowance for universities. Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics, 2008. 602 p.
  29. Radaev V.V. What is the market: economic and sociological approach. Preprint WP4/2006/07. Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics, 2006. 48 p.
  30. Brykin A.V., Kunizheva D.A., Bolshunova S.A. Methodological approaches to the study of financial and economic culture. Bulletin of the Financial University. Humanities. 2021. No. 6. (In Rus.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodologicheskie-podhody-k-issledovaniyu-finansovo-ekonomicheskoy-kultury

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies