The problem of constitutionalism in domestic constitutional projects of the second half of the XVIII century


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Today, one of the most important, most difficult tasks in Russia is the development, improvement of real, practical constitutionalism. For its successful solution, of great importance is the study, taking into account the historical experience of our country in this area. And it is precisely in this that the relevance of the presented article lies, which is devoted to the analysis of the first domestic constitutional projects that appeared in the second half of the 18th century, the consolidation, regulation of the institutions of constitutionalism in them, their possibility of using, of course, with appropriate amendments in modern conditions. Note that these issues have been and remain in the focus of attention of foreign scientists, for example, D.L. Ransel, S.N. Wittaker, C.S. Lenard, M. Raev,Bartolissi.The author’s approach to the very concept of “constitutionalism” as a multilateral phenomenon associated with the real presence of the constitution is presented; practical constitutionalism; theoretical constitutionalism. The characteristic of constitutional drafts, theprovisionscontainedinthem, concerningconstitutionalismofrepresentativesofvariouskindsofcurrentsofpoliticalandlegalthought of the second half of the 18th century, and especially the nobility, enlightenment, and popular movement, is given. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that, first of all, in the Russian constitutional projects of that time, three most important institutes of constitutionalism are fixed - representation, and in this regard, representative democracy, parliamentarism; self management; separation of powers. Their contents are disclosed. Note that all these three institutions are present in modern Russia. But the question of their improvement, real effective functioning remains in demand. First of all, three fundamental research methods were used in the work: dogmatic; historical and legal; comparative legal. The article is of interest to government officials, students, university professors, researchers, all those who are interested in issues of constitutional law of the Russian Federation, the domestic history of the state and law.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yury L. Shul’zhenko

Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: constitution@igpran.ru
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Main Researcher; Head of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice Department Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Владимирский-Буданов М.Ф. Обзор истории русского права. 6-е изд. Киев: Изд. книгопродавца Н.Я. Оглоблина; Тип. т-ва И.Н. Кушнерев и Ко, 1909. 699 с.
  2. Грацианский П.С. Конституционные проекты России второй половины XVIII в. // Советское государство и право. 1980. № 7. С. 87-95.
  3. История политических и правовых учений: учебник для вузов / под общ. ред. проф. О.В. Мартышина. М.: Норма, 2004. 899 с.
  4. Манифест об учреждении Императорского Совета и разделении Сената на департаменты // Сб. Русского истор. об-ва. СПб., 1871. Т. VIII. С. 202-217.
  5. Общественные движения в России в первой половине XIX века. Т. 1. СПб.: Герольд, 1905. 496 с.
  6. Романович-Славатинский А.В. Система русского государственного права в его историко-догматическом развитии сравнительно с государственным правом западных стран. Ч. 1: Основные государственные законы. Киевъ, 1886. 299 с.
  7. Российский конституционализм в контексте историко-правовых исследований: сб. науч. тр. СПб.: Президентская библиотека имени Б.Н. Ельцина, 2014. 227 с.
  8. Шульженко Ю.Л. Очерк российского конституционализма монархического периода. М.: Институт государства и права РАН, 2008. 144 с.
  9. Шумигорский Е.С. Император Павел I. Жизнь и царствование. СПб.: Тип. В.Д. Смирнова, 1907. 264 с.
  10. Якушкин В.Е. Государственная власть и проекты государственной реформы в России. СПб.: Издание Г.Ф. Львовича, 1906. 160 с.
  11. Ransel D.L. The politics of Catherine Russia. The Panin party. New Haven and London: Reuters, 1975. 331 p.
  12. Whittaker C.H. The reforming Tsar: The redefinition of autocratic duty eighteenth - Centure Russia. Slavic Review. 1992. Vol. 51. No. 1.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies