Understanding the Phenomenon of Religion in a Cross-Cultural Context: From Cicero to Modern Youth

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The article describes some aspects of the attitude of modern student youth of two Russian regions to the concepts behind the word “religio” (religion). The latter is understood in connotation with three normative forms for the history of the Russian community: 1) as a basic spiritual and moral concept that underlies the life of every individual, the state and the entire human community as a whole (Cicero’s «religio» paradigm); 2) philosophical and confessional legal norms of the 1000-year history of Christianity in Russia; 3) the phenomenology of humanism and religious tolerance in relation to the anthropological foundations of the individual and collective life of each member of the global community. The results of a survey of 235 students from Arkhangelsk and Vladimir on issues related to the modern attitude of young people to understanding the concept of religion are also reflected.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Evgeny Arinin

Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov

Email: eiarinin@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; Head of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Vladimir, Russian Federation

Dmitry Petrosyan

Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov; Vladimir Branch of Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)

Email: ilyich87@yandex.ru
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor; assistant professor at the Department of Sociology; assistant professor at the Department of Social and Humanitarian Studies Vladimir, Russian Federation

Roman Tsyganov

Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov

Email: tsiganov2000@mail.ru
post-graduate student at the Depart-ment of Philosophy and Religious Studies Vladimir, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Cole S. Cicero and the rise of deification at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. P. 14.
  2. Harries J. The law in Cicero’s writing. In: The Cambridge Companion to Cicero by Catherine Steel. Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 113.
  3. Lisdorf A. The conflict over Cicero’s house: An analysis of the ritual element in De domo sua // Numen. 2005. Vol. 52. P. 448.
  4. Riggsby A.M. Brill’s Post reditum speeches. In: Companion to Cicero: Oratory and rhetoric / Ed. by J.M. May. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, 2002. P. 159.
  5. Arinin E.I., Glagolev V.S., Markova N.M. Paradoxes of identity with ἄθεος and religio in religious discussions of modern Russia. Problems of Philosophy. 2021. No. 9. P. 155. (In Rus.)
  6. Gorenshtein V.O. Introductory article. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. P. 261. (In Rus.)
  7. Markova N.M., Lyutaeva M.S. Folk religion as a phenomenon of intercultural communication: conceptualization of the concept of “native”/“vernacular”. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 125-137. (In Rus.)
  8. Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speech to the people upon returning from exile. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. Pp. 263, 268. (In Rus.)
  9. Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speeches in two volumes. Vol. II. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1962.
  10. Shokhin V.K. Philosophy of religion and its historical forms (antiquity - the end of the 18th century). Moscow: Alfa-M, Institute of Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010. P. 278.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies