LEGAL STATUS OF DEFENSE COUNSEL IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The purpose of this article is to review the legal status of the defender in criminal proceedings in the light of the amendments and additions made to the code of criminal procedure. The article reveals some features of the legal status of the defender and the conduct of legal proceedings, as well as the conflict of laws provisions of article 56 of the code of criminal procedure. The amendments made to part 3 of article 56 of the CPC are controversial because they contradict the purpose of criminal proceedings. In the procedural literature, these changes are interpreted ambiguously. In this regard, we believe that the interrogation of a lawyer (defender) in criminal proceedings as a witness, even with the consent of the suspect and the accused is impossible, since such a provision is contrary to the purpose of criminal proceedings and the implementation of the functions of the criminal process. The article can be used in the investigation and consideration of criminal cases. The novelty of this work lies in the fact that it deals with the conflict of laws provisions of p. 3 h. 3 article. 56 of the code of criminal procedure.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Violeta Kharzinova

North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: harzinova@yandex.ru
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, teacher of the Department of State and Civil Legal Disciplines

Bibliografia

  1. Харзинова В.М. Некоторые особенности осуществления защиты в уголовном судопроизводстве Российской Федерации // Пробелы в Российском законодательстве. 2018, № 6, с.242-243.
  2. Харзинова В.М. Особенности участия защитника в уголовном судопроизводстве // Черные дыры в Российском законодательстве. 2017, № 4, с.15-17.
  3. Шхагапсоев З.Л., Харзинова В.М. Участники уголовного судопроизводства, способствующие обеспечению и реализации функции защиты // Пробелы в Российском законодательстве. 2014, № 1, с.187.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies