Social Integration in the Context of Historical Dynamics

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The purpose of the study is to analyze the problem of social integration in the context of historical development. The research methodology is based on the functional method and also includes the use of historical and comparative methods. Research results. The study shows various aspects of the problem of social integration, analyzes the main approaches to the study of social integration in socio-philosophical thought, reveals various ways of social integration in the context of historical development, reveals the difference between the mechanisms of social integration in traditional societies and modern societies. Challenges facing modern societies in the era of globalization related to new problems that hinder social integration at the level of national communities, nation-states are shown. It is noted that in recent years a trend towards deglobalization has emerged, however, the challenges of social integration at the level of individual states, associated with the globalization processes that took place earlier, have not been overcome, since the causes that give rise to them remain, in particular, migration processes, a single information space, and the economic interdependence of various states.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Vladimir Dubrovin

Institute of Sociology – a branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: vladimir.dubrovin@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0009-0008-7108-5458
Código SPIN: 8268-3370

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.); Senior Researcher

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Anipkin M.A. Theory of social and system integration: Origins and development. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. 2009. No. 2 (10). Рp. 80–83. (In Rus.)
  2. Beck W. What is Globalization? Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2001. 304 р.
  3. Geri D., Geri J. Big explanatory sociological dictionary. Moscow: AST, Veche. 1999. Vol. 2. P. 230.
  4. Hobbes T. Leviathan, or Matter, form and power of the church and civil state. A. Guterman (transl. from English). Moscow: Mysl, 2001. 478 р.
  5. Durkheim E. On the division of social labor. A.B. Gofman (transl. from the French). Moscow: Canon+, 1996. 432 р.
  6. Kildyushov O. The problem of social order (Hobbesian problem): To the heuristics and pragmatics of the constitutive question of the modern theory of society. Sociological Review. 2016. Vol. 15. No. 3. Pp. 122–149. (In Rus.)
  7. Okatov A.V. Sociological concept of F. Tönnies as a theoretical basis for studying the institutionalization and functioning of modern public organizations. Bulletin of TSU. 2016. No. 11 (163). Pp. 8–27. (In Rus.)
  8. Dictionary. In: Dobrenkov V.I., Kravchenko A.I. Sociology. In 3 vols. Moscow: Sociology Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2003–2004.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML