NATO’s Eastward advance is a threat to Russia’s security as the main subject of the Russian world


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Based on a systematic approach, the article considers the socio-philosophical problem of NATO’s military and political activities. The author justifi and analyzed the main approaches to assessing the activities of NATO. Specifi , the historical approach genetically reveals the failure of the creation of the North Atlantic Alliance in 1949, when the Western countries, the USSR did not pose any threat in military terms. The military-strategic approach justifi the danger of the modern military strategy of NATO, associated with the entry into it of various countries of Eastern Europe, as well as Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, the deployment of modern means of armed struggle on their territory and the creation of military bases. The military-political approach justifi the falseness of the statements declared by the Alliance about the successful conduct of peacekeeping, including counter-terrorist operations in various regions of the world. The author proves the danger to the world and Russia of the ideological concept of NATO, based on the theory of “Global strike” and the possibility of using nuclear weapons. The purpose of the study is to reveal the fact of NATO’s military potential building up and substantiate the North Atlantic Alliance’s eastward advances as a threat to Russia’s security, as the main subject of the Russian world. Conclusions . 1. The article proves that in the late 40s of the twentieth century, there was no objective need to create a military bloc of NATO. 2. Our country, both in the historical past and now, conducts a predictable foreign policy in the world aimed at stabilizing international relations. 3. In modern conditions, the advance of NATO to the East is a threat to Russia as the main subject of the Russian world.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Vladimir Ksenofontov

Military University of the Ministry of Defence of Russia

Email: kvvmvoky173@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Philos.); lecturer at the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Анненков В.И., Баранов С.Н., Волохов В.И. и др. Междуна родная безопасность: геополитические и военно-политические аспекты современности: учебник / под общ. ред. проф. В.И. Анненкова. М.: РУСАВИА, 2015. С. 348-352.
  2. Гибридные войны XXI столетия: происхождение, сущность и место в цивилизационном процессе: монография / А.С. Брычков [и др.]. Смоленск: ВА ВПВО ВС РФ, 2019. С. 250-262.
  3. Григорьев Г.Н. Миссия невыполнима // Военно-промышленный курьер. 2005. № 49. С. 10.
  4. Ксенофонтов В.В. Русский мир как социокультурный феномен в условиях эволюции международных отношений // Военно-академический журнал. 2018. № 2 (18). С. 127-129.
  5. Леонов А. Сталин против НАТО / ВПК. Военно-промышленный курьер. Общероссийская еженедельная газета. 2-8 апреля 2019. № 12 (775). С. 11.
  6. Смирнов Д. Россия ответит на ядерные угрозы // Комсомольская правда. 2016. № 52-с. С. 2.
  7. Справочник НАТО. Юбилейное издание к пятидесятой годовщине НАТО. Брюссель, 1988. С. 25.
  8. Суверенитет России и проблемы его сохранения в меняющемся мире: монография / А.С. Брычков [и др.] Смоленск: ВА ВПВО РФ, 2016. С. 156-159.
  9. Укрепление мира и стабильности в районах кризисов / Брифинг НАТО. Октябрь 2003. С. 1.
  10. Шойгу С.К. Коалиция против нестабильности // Военно-промышленный курьер. Общероссийская еженедельная газета. 30 апреля - 6 мая 2019 г. № 6 (779). С. 6.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##