Rousseau’s “Social contract” and the concept of alienation
- 作者: Ogarkov A.N.1, Smetankina L.V.2
-
隶属关系:
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “St. Petersburg State Academy of Arts and Industry named after A.L. Stieglitz”
- Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “Military Academy of Communications named after Marshal Soviet Union S.M. Budyonny” Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
- 期: 卷 10, 编号 4 (2020)
- 页面: 143-148
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/538074
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-4-143-148
- ID: 538074
如何引用文章
详细
The article actualizes the problem of the possibilities of achieving freedom in civil society. The authors consider this problem through the analysis of the conceptual essence of the phenomenon of “social contract” in its relationship with the concept of alienation. Purpose of the article: to analyze the concept of alienation in versatile historical interpretations of historical and socio-philosophical thought. The article examines the views of Rousseau on the relationship between citizens and the state. The texts of Hobbes, Locke, Hegel and Marx, which considered the concept of alienation, are analyzed. The article substantiates the escalation significance of the socio-philosophical understanding of the state of “civil” freedom, analyzes the essence of the general logic of legal consciousness, identifies the main positions of Rousseau’s concept, which defines a social contract as a dialectical unity of alienated potentials that form a dynamic whole “political machine”. The article also details the positions of Hobbes, Locke, Hegel and Marx, given in comparison with the views of Rousseau. The category of “alienation” is analyzed in the context of specific relations between the subject and his definite function, arising as a result of the loss of the initial integrity/unity and being a predictor of the impoverishment of the nature of the subject itself, leading to the transformation of the function itself. The article concludes about the relevance of Rousseau’s theory of alienation for socio-philosophical knowledge. The authors come to the conclusion that the concept of alienation in versatile historical interpretations makes a full turn before returning to its most “balanced” interpretation - Rousseau’s “social contract”. These provisions remain relevant today. The social contract destroys the “natural” generic quality of a person - to be free, alienating her arbitrary, and often just random gifts in favor of a voluntary association that rationally uses all possible and ultimate values of this ideal and real state of a person burdened with social duty.
全文:
![受限制的访问](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
作者简介
Aleksandr Ogarkov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “St. Petersburg State Academy of Arts and Industry named after A.L. Stieglitz”
Email: suer53@inbox.ru
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof.; associate professor at the Department St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Lyudmila Smetankina
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “Military Academy of Communications named after Marshal Soviet Union S.M. Budyonny” Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Email: lsmetankina.umo@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Philos.); professor at the Department of Humanities and Socio-Economic Disciplines St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
参考
- Гоббс Т. Левиафан. М.: Мысль, 2001. 480 с.
- Локк Дж. Сочинения. В 3-х т. Т. 3. М.: Мысль, 1988. 668 с.
- Лукач Д. К онтологии общественного бытия. Пролегомены. М.: Прогресс, 1991. 417 с.
- Руссо Ж.Ж. Об общественном договоре или принципы политического права. М.: Гос. социально-экон. изд-во, 1938. 124 с.
- Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест коммунистической партии // Сочинения. Изд. 2. Т. 4. М.: Политиздат, 1955. С. 419-459.
- Философский словарь / под ред. И.Т. Фролова. 7-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Республика, 2001. 719 с.
- Гегель Г.В.Ф. Философия права. АН Институт философии. М.: Мысль, 1990. 524 с.
- Огарков А.Н. Послесловие // Преображенский Г. Смысл коммунизма. Опыт ретроспективного исследования. СПб.: Алетейя, 2011. 224 с.
- Агамбен Дж. Профанации. М.: Гилея 2014, 2014. 112 с.
- Бодрийяр Ж. Система вещей. М.: Рудомино, 1999. 224 с.
- Огарков А.Н. Своевременная книга // Маркс К. Капитал / пер. с нем. СПб.: Изд. группа «Лениздат», «Команда А», 2013. 512 с.
- Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Дебаты по поводу закона о краже леса // Сочинения. Изд. 2. Т. 1. М.: Политиздат, 1955. С. 119-160.
- Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://publ.lib.ru/ARCHIVES/M/MARKS_Karl,_ENGEL’S_Fridrih/_Marks_K.,_Engel’s_F.html
- Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Изд. 2. Т. 3. М.: Политиздат, 1955. 625 с.
- Сидоренко А.И., Ибрагимова Ю.Э. Право, закон и суд в трудах Карла Маркса // Журнал российского права. 2018. № 7 (259). С. 163-181.
补充文件
![](/img/style/loading.gif)