Institutional Models of Social Partnership Policy: Foreign Experience, Russian Practice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

In the article, the authors determined that due to the variety of conditions, types, subjects, etc. of social partnership, the policy of such partnership is multivariate and can be typologized on various grounds, which allows to reveal its diversity and multivariance. At the same time, the typology carried out in the article showed that there is no single, suitable model of social partnership policy for all countries. Each of these models has its advantages and disadvantages and should correspond to a set of conditions reflecting the national characteristics of a particular country. The role of motivation on the part of not only the state, but, first of all, society for the formation and implementation of this policy is also great. In addition to the positive consequences, the policy of social partnership carries risks, such as: the risk of formalization of social partnership relations, the risk of violation of the principles of social partnership, etc.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Lyudmila Ilyicheva

Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPR FCTAS RAS)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: lilitcheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0223-6418
Scopus 作者 ID: 331456

Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Professor, Director, Public-private Partnership Center, chief researcher

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

Elena Parshina

Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Email: yelena.parshina.1970@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2490-8046

Applicant

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Ilyicheva M.V., Huseynov R.S., Ilyicheva L.E. Dialogue of power and society in the mechanism of social transformation. Socio-political Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 5. P. 40. (In Rus.)
  2. Ilyina O.Y. Social partnership: from social and labor tripartism to the universal constitutional principle. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2022. No. 8. P. 33. (In Rus.)
  3. Temnitskiy A.L. Conditions for the formation of partner-oriented workers at Russian industrial enterprises. Official Website of IS RAS. 2010. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=1816 (data of accesses: 01.12.2023).
  4. Hassel A. Policies and Politics in Social Pacts in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations. 2008. No 15 (1). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228159801_Policies_and_Politics_in_Social_Pacts_in_Europe (data of accesses: 01.12.2023).
  5. Egorov S.A. International guidelines for social partnership at the local level. Business in Law. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 105–109. (In Rus.)
  6. Khasanov M.H. Improving the regulatory framework for social partnership in the states of the Eurasian Economic Union, taking into account international labor standards. Lex Russica. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 160–175. (In Rus.)
  7. Vitko F.P. Social partnership. Minsk: GIUST BSU, 2008.
  8. Ebbinghaus B. Reforming Bismarckian corporatism: The changing role of social partnership in Continental Europe. In: A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in Continental Europe. B. Palier (ed.). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010. Pp. 255–278.
  9. Shapkina E.A. Public-public partnership: problems of theory, methodology, practice: abstrac tdis. Dr. Sci. (Law). Moscow: 2023. Pp. 11–12.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


##common.cookie##