Social entrepreneurship as a factor in improving the quality of life in the region

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article discusses the problems of the formation and development of social entrepreneurship. The main criteria and signs of social entrepreneurship are analyzed.

The purpose of the study is to identify the potential of social entrepreneurship in improving the quality of life in the region (using the example of the Republic of Mordovia). The research is based on theoretical approaches that consider social entrepreneurship through the concepts of social capital, social and moral responsibility, and quality of life. The directions and criteria of social entrepreneurship are considered on the basis of the regulatory framework, and data from an expert survey are presented.

Conclusions. As a result of the conducted research, the authors conclude that social entrepreneurship is currently becoming an active subject of social policy implemented at the regional level. The authors propose to consider social entrepreneurship as a hybrid phenomenon that combines economic strategies and social activity. In the Republic of Mordovia, social entrepreneurship acts as a tool for solving local socio-economic problems. The region has seen an increase in initiatives aimed at supporting vulnerable segments of the population, creating jobs and developing local communities. Social entrepreneurs become catalysts for change, forming a new consciousness in which everyone has the opportunity to contribute to the common good. Empirical evidence shows that social entrepreneurship contributes to the development of social capital through strengthening social ties, building trust, maintaining reputation and introducing social innovations.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Pavel Pankov

National Research Ogarev Mordovian State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: print84@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-5978-8791

postgraduate student, Department of Sociology and Social Work

俄罗斯联邦, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia

Katerina Fofanova

National Research Ogarev Mordovian State University

Email: kateri02@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2344-8986
SPIN 代码: 4082-7312

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Professor, Professor, Department of Sociology and Social Work

俄罗斯联邦, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia

参考

  1. Bourdieu P. Forms of capital. Economic Sociology. 2002. Vol. 5. (In Rus.)
  2. Karibov A.P. Formation and development of the Institute of social entrepreneurship in Russia. Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 10. Рp. 403–412. (In Rus.)
  3. Lebedintseva L.A., Deryugin P.P. Business and social entrepreneurship: A review of basic theoretical models. Journal of Social Policy Research. 2021. Vol. 1.
  4. Alekseeva E.A., Alyoshina M.V., Bekarev A.M. et al. National projects and reforms of the 2000s: Modernization of social policy. Moscow: Variant, 2009. 277 p.
  5. Pankova E.G., Volkova M.V. Development of socially oriented business in the Republic of Mordovia. In: Development of the Russian social space: New challenges and prospects. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Saransk, November 30, 2017). Saransk: Scientific Center for Socio-economic Monitoring, 2018. Pp. 147–151.
  6. Smirnov V.A. Regional systems of social entrepreneurship in Russia: Typology, development factors, key contradictions. Journal of Social Policy Research. 2021. Vol. 1.
  7. Solovyova T.V., Bistyakina D.A., Pankova E.G. The possibilities of social work to improve the quality of life of the elderly and veterans in the Republic of Mordovia. In: The social potential of the elderly: Conditions, experience, problems of effective application. Materials of the Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference (Saransk, November 15, 2018). L.I. Savinov (gen. ed.). Saransk: Individual entrepreneur Vyacheslav S. Afanasyev, 2019. Pp. 157–160.
  8. Sorokin P.A. Man. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat, 1992. 542 p.
  9. Sychev A.A. The modalities of moral responsibility. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy. 2015. Vol. 2. Pp. 37–45. (In Rus.)
  10. Fofanova K.V. Methodological issues of measuring the quality of life in the region. Regionology. 2016. Vol. 4 (97).
  11. Fofanova K.V. Social policy in the post-global world. Hill M., Irving Z. Exploring the world of social policy. Journal of Social Policy Research. 2022. Vol. 1.
  12. Azmat F. Sustainable development in developing countries: The role of social entrepreneurs. International Journal of Public Administration. 2013. No. 36 (5). Рp. 293–304. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2012.756891.
  13. Yiu D.W., Wan W.P., Ng F. et al. Sentimental drivers of social entrepreneurship: A study of China’s Guangcai (Glorious) program. Management and Organization Review. 2014. No. 10 (1). Рp. 55–80.
  14. Hagerty M.R., Cummins R.A., Ferriss A.L. Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research. 2001. No. 2. Рp. 1–96.
  15. McAnany E. Social entrepreneurship and communication for development and social change rethinking innovation. Nordicom Review. 2012. No. 33. Рp. 205–218.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML