Anthropology of Movement in the Context of Religious Studies: Perspectives, Prospects, Research Programs
- Authors: Lyutaeva M.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Alexander and Nikolay Stoletov Vladimir State University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 236-241
- Section: Philosophy of religion and religious studies
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/687925
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-3-236-241
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ULVLBH
- ID: 687925
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Anthropology of movement is one of the modern optics in humanitarian movements, which arose in the context of modern “turns” in philosophy, such as the “material turn”, “spatial turn”, “mobility turn”, which drew attention to the significance of material structures in social being. The study examines the leading approaches in this direction, developed by J. Urry, T. Ingold, Russian anthropologist and ethnographer A.V. Golovnev. The methodological framework of the systems of interconnected mobilities (J. Urry), ecological anthropology of landscape paths (T. Ingold), the scheme “motive-decision-action” (A.V. Golovnev) can be successfully applied in the field of academic religious studies, applying to the analysis of various cases, both in the field of sociology of religion, the study of the autopoiesis of religious communication reflected in texts, as well as in the field of private religion.
Full Text
About the authors
Maria S. Lyutaeva
Alexander and Nikolay Stoletov Vladimir State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: liutaeva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9972-6674
SPIN-code: 8221-5084
Scopus Author ID: 57732777600
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Russian Federation, VladimirReferences
- Arinin E.I., Lyutaeva M.S., Silantyeva M.V. Understanding the “vernacular”: between “native chickens”, architectural “peculiarity”, and “living religiosity”. Voprosy filosofii. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 121–131. (In Rus.). doi: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-2-121-131.
- Aristotle. Physics. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2023. 320 p.
- Vakhshtayn V. Sociology of things and the “turn to the material” in social theory. In: Sociology of things (collection of articles). V. Vakhshtayn (ed.). Moscow: Territory of the Future. 2006. 390 p.
- Golovnev A.V. Anthropology of travel from imago mundi to selfie. Ural Historical Bulletin. 2016. No. 2 (51). Pp. 6–16. (In Rus.)
- Golovnev A.V. Anthropology and ethnography of movement. In: Golovnev A.V., Belorussova S.Yu., Kisser T.S. Essays on the anthropology of movement. St. Petersburg: MAE RAS, 2020. Pp. 22–26.
- Golovnev A.V. Roadmap of the anthropology of movement. Ural Historical Bulletin. 2012. No. 2 (35). Pp. 4–14. (In Rus.)
- Ingold T. Immersing things in life: Creative interweaving in the world of materials. Neprikosnovenny zapas. 2021. No. 2 (136). Pp. 32–49. (In Rus.)
- Luhmann N. Social systems. I.D. Gaziev (transl. from German). St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. 641 p.
- Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Ontology of the process: Process and time. Moscow: Golos, 2014. 724 p.
- Park R. Consciousness of a vagabond: Reflections on the relationship between consciousness and movement. Sociological Review. 2003. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 35–37. (In Rus.)
- Urry J. Mobilities. A.V. Lazarev (transl. from English). Moscow: Praxis, 2012. 576 p.
- Kharlamov, N.A. New society or new science of society? Sociology of mobilities by John Urry. In: Urry J. Mobilities. A.V. Lazarev (transl. from English). Moscow: Praxis, 2012. Pp. 7–58.
- Primiano L.N. Vernacular religion and the search for method in religious folklife. Western Folklore. 1995. No. 1. Pp. 37–56.
- Waardenburg J.D.J. Official and popular religion as a problem in Islamic studies. In: Vrijhof P.H., Waardenburg J.J. Official and popular religion. Analysis of a theme for religious studies. The Hague, Paris; N.Y.: Mouton Publishers, 1979. 739 p.
Supplementary files
