Legal Protection in the Implementation of State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control: Looking for a Balance of Interests

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of the legal protection of controlled persons in the implementation of control and supervisory measures. The authors comprehensively considered legal protection in the implementation of control and supervisory activities, as a set of legal and organizational means to maintain a balance of private and public interests. However, due to the insufficient legal formalization of the legal categories “public” and “private” interests, the prevailing importance in determining their content is assigned to the discretion of the court when making certain decisions. The authors conclude that the determination of the balance of participants in the control and supervisory relations clearly hinges on the regulation of the peculiarities of the implementation of the legal status of subjects of private and public law

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Olga S. Rogacheva

Voronezh State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga_rogacheva@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8135-4517
http://www.law.vsu.ru/structure/admlaw/personal/rogacheva.html

doctor of law, assistant professor, professor

Russian Federation, 1, University Square, 394018 Voronezh

Yulia B. Nosova

Voronezh State University

Email: yulia_sh81@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 1894-3535
http://www.law.vsu.ru/structure/laborlaw/personal/nosova.html

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor eLibrary

Russian Federation, 1, University Square, 394018 Voronezh

References

  1. Alekseev SS. Obshchaya teoriya prava. In 2 Vol. Vol. 2. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1981. 361 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Khorunzhii SN. Pravovoi balans kak samostoyatel’naya yuridicheskaya tsennost’: mekhanizmy ego obespecheniya i regulirovaniya. Voronezh: Izdatel’skii dom Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 2019. 526 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Dolgopolova V. Obzor del, rassmotrennykh Konstitutsionnym Sudom Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2012;86(1):115–128. (In Russ.).
  4. Zelentsov AB. Institut obrashcheniya k organu – avtoru akta: neobkhodimost’ vozrozhdeniya (vozvrashchayas’ k probleme). Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2019;(10):30–38. (In Russ.).
  5. Nosova YuB. Powers of the Prosecutor’s Office in the field of organization and implementation of state control (supervision) and municipal control: problems of new regulatory legal regulation. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2021;(4):156–165. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.4/3703
  6. Zagryatskov MD. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i pravo zhaloby. Moscow: Pravo i zhizn’; 1925. 244 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Afanas’ev SF, Ermakov AN. O nekotorykh aspektakh ispol’zovaniya primiritel’nykh protsedur po delam, kotorye voznikayut iz publichnykh pravootnoshenii. In: Sudebnye i nesudebnye formy zashchity grazhdanskikh prav: sbornik statei k yubileyu doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora Eleny Ivanovny Nosyrevoi. Ed. by D.G. Fil’chenko. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2020. 308 p. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies