Addressing Contradictions in Evidence: the Duty of the Court

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article examines the complexities surrounding the court’s assessment of evidence, particularly concerning contradictions encountered during the adjudication of criminal cases. It emphasizes that the resolution of such contractions is an essential aspect of a judge’s procedural duties. Mere logical coherence in the court’s conclusions is insufficient to validate a verdict; instead, all significant contradictions within the case materials must be meticulously identified and rectified through objective scrutiny and evaluation of the evidence. Additionally, the author highlights the court’s obligation to justify, in cases where irreducible doubts persist regarding the defendant’s guilt, the inability to eliminate such doubts in the verdict.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksey Yu. Astafyev

Voronezh State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: woltgam@rambler.ru
SPIN-code: 4577-6659

candidate of jurisprudence

Russian Federation, Voronezh

References

  1. Pascal B. Thoughts. Moscow: REFL-book; 1994. (In Russ.)
  2. Ivin AA. The contradiction of death is like... Philosophical essay on logical contradiction. Moscow-Berlin: Direct-Media; 2016. (In Russ.)
  3. New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 Vol. Vol. 3. Moscow: Thought; 2010. (In Russ.)
  4. Astafiev AYu. Analysis of contradictions in evidence in a court verdict. Russian Journal of Studies. 2023;10(2):65–72. (In Russ.) EDN: KRIGKK doi: 10.17816/RJLS115227
  5. Astafiev AYu. Evaluation of consistency of evidence in the sentencing and its review in higher courts. Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 2023;10(2):89–96. (In Russ.) EDN: MUESLL doi: 10.17816/RJLS482431
  6. Martishina NI. Epistemic virtues of a scientist: toward a problem statement. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia. 2023;29(3):257–262. (In Russ.) EDN: LFXJYW doi: 10.24412/1999-625X-2023-390-257-262
  7. Shakirov IYa. Doubt as a philosophical category. Ufa: Vagant; 2010. (In Russ.) EDN: SBSQDD
  8. Yurovitskaya LN. English linguocultural concept “Doubt” and methods of its linguistic manifestation [dissertation abstract]. Samara; 2005. (In Russ.) EDN: NNHOVB
  9. Issues of criminal proceedings in the practice of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Moscow: Gosyurizdat; 1955. (In Russ.)
  10. Ladushkin SI. The problem of explication of consequence in legal logic. In: Philosophical problems of branch legal sciences. Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. St. Petersburg, 2020. Saint Petersburg: SPbU Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 2020. P. 43–48. (In Russ.) EDN: FXUUIZ
  11. Sumarokova LN. Legal logic: communicative concept. Odessa: Phoenix; 2015. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of judicial cognition during the consideration of a criminal case.

Download (298KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies