Overview of Digital Technologies for Anti-corruption Purposes

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article was prepared within the framework of analysis of the results of the events dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. The article gives an overview of the possibilities of using digital technologies to counteract corruption. It is noted that a prerequisite for the successful realization of the benefits of digitalization of public practice is the availability of technological infrastructure, as well as improvement of the legal response associated with the implementation of technological policy. Anti-corruption practices related to Big Data processing (Big Data), distributed registers technology (blockchain), data mining technology (neural networks, artificial intelligence), crowdsourcing technology, and information technology that identifies corruption risks in the financial sector (Forensic Tools) are discussed in more detail. However, the realization of the potential of digitalization in this area implies the need to improve the legal response concerning the implementation of technological policies aimed at suppressing corruptive factors. In this regard, the role of individual judicial regulation as one of the ways to overcome legal gaps and conflicts increases.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Oleg Stepanov

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: soa-45@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1103-580X
SPIN 代码: 8156-9725
Scopus 作者 ID: 57208665632

doctor of law, professor, chief researcher

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Denis Basangov

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: d_basang@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2776-4241
SPIN 代码: 3456-3920

candidate of legal sciences, senior researcher

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Xiao W. Freedom of information reform in China: Information flow analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2013;79(4):790–808. doi: 10.1177/0020852313500598
  2. Aryamov AA, Ruyeva EO. Corruption combating in conditions of digitization: national experience. Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2021;(8): 57–60. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3783-2021-8-57-60
  3. Khayrutdinova LR. Anticorruption crowdsourcing as social feedback mechanism on a “society-state-society” in the fight against corruption. Modern Scientific Research and Innovations. 2016;(8):347–352. (In Russ.).
  4. Truntsevsky YV. E-anti-corruption or e-corruption: the influence of global digitization. International Public and Private Law. 2019;(4):42–48. (In Russ.).
  5. Ivanova JuA, Sarbaev GM. K voprosu o kiberprestupnosti. In: Tsifrovye transformatsii ehkonomiki i prava: collection of scientific abstracts of the National Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow, 2021 Dec 8. Volgograd; 2022. P. 58–64. (In Russ.).
  6. Gumerov LA, Suleimanova ASh. Individual Judicial Regulation of Legal Relations in the Scientific and Technological Sphere. Russian Justice. 2023;(4):48–54. (In Russ.).
  7. Stepin AB. Types of individual judicial regulation. Russian Journal of Legal Research. 2018;5(1):193–197. (In Russ.).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2023

许可 URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

##common.cookie##