SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION OF FRAUD


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article discusses the qualification of a public dangerous act - «Fraud», the liability for which is provided for in Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and which has similar characteristics with other socially dangerous acts against property, which determines the relevance of this topic, scientific works on which including those aimed at assisting practitioners (employees) of the Russian law enforcement bloc in preventing, disclosing and identifying NTRY material nature. Along with this, the relevance of this topic is also associated with the annual significant increase in the number of fraud-related crimes registered by law enforcement agencies aimed at criminal seizure of property or rights to it. Modern technologies, the computerization of society, the development of economic and social relations, the emergence of new types of «remote» services provided, undoubtedly push both «experienced» scammers and «novice» scammers to attempt quick and easy enrichment at the expense of others and the state. It is in this connection that in this article the author considers the issues of qualifying the corpus delicti provided for by 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and its delimitation from related corpus delicti. The article is a structured information material for law enforcement officials specializing in the investigation of this category of cases [2].

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Valery A. Hutuev

North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: Lel4993@mail.ru
PhD in law, Lecturer, Department of Law Enforcement, police major

Margarita Kh. Mashekusheva

North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: mashekuasheva@mail.ru
PhD in Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Law Enforcement

References

  1. Уголовное право в эволюционирующем обществе: проблемы и перспективы: сб. науч. ст. по материалам VII Междунар. заочной науч.-практ. конф., 15-16 декабря 2016 года / ред. кол.: А. А. Гребеньков (отв. ред.) [и др.]. ЮгоЗап. гос. ун-т. - Курск, 2017. - 432 с. ISBN 978-5-7681-1222-6.
  2. Голяндин Н.П., Машекуашева М.Х. Проблемные вопросы противодействия механизмам финансирования терроризма. Социально-политические науки. 2018. № 4. С. 158-160.
  3. Шогенов А.М. Современное состояние преступлений экстремистской направленности в России и проблемы доказывания. Пробелы в российском законодательстве. №3. 2019.
  4. Гарифуллина Разиля Файзуллиновна. Некоторые вопросы квалификации вымогательства (СТ. 163 УК РФ). Евразийский научно-исследовательский институт проблем права.2016.№3. С. 208-210.
  5. Хутуев В.А. Незаконное вознаграждение от имени юридического лица как административное правонарушение: история и перспектива. Пробелы в российском законодательстве. 2018. № 5. С. 266-269.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies