Norms and Tasks in Russian Legislation on Administrative Proceedings
- Authors: Gizyatova S.V.1, Kurochkin A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Naberezhnye Chelny Institute, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 45-49
- Section: Public Law (State and Legal Sciences)
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2541-8025/article/view/687996
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-3-45-49
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AVDSCC
- ID: 687996
Cite item
Abstract
The authors' goal is to identify the theoretical content of norm-tasks. The authors also seek to determine the features of the legal formalization of such norms in the legislation on administrative proceedings. This study involved the main methodological approaches that are used in the scientific study of legal technique. The main significance among them was given to the formal-logical method in connection with the structural-functional approach. Together they allowed to identify general and special features of legislative norms in the sphere of administrative legal proceedings. Of particular methodological significance was the textual analysis of the current Russian legislation and the method of legal hermeneutics. It contributed to the distinction between norms-tasks from norms-goals, norms-principles and norms-guarantees. Conclusion: the norms-tasks in the Russian legislation on administrative proceedings are expressed in several forms. The criteria for their distinction are: legal technique, the subject and method of legal regulation, as well as the functional purpose of a separate normative structure. In combination, these features allow us to classify these norms into general (effective in all administrative-procedural legal relations) and special (effective at individual stages or in certain categories of administrative cases).
Full Text

About the authors
Svetlana V. Gizyatova
Naberezhnye Chelny Institute, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: dmdr1987@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 1128-9226
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and International Law
Portugal, Naberezhnye ChelnyAnatoly V. Kurochkin
Naberezhnye Chelny Institute, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: Kurochkin.tolik@bk.ru
SPIN-code: 1017-7618
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Dr. Sci. (Politics), Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and International Law
Russian Federation, Naberezhnye ChelnyReferences
- Buyanova M.O. Concept and meaning of defining the goals and objectives of sectoral legislation. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2024. No. 1 (56). pp. 85–94.
- Gorban V.S. Dialectics of the concept versus the dialectic of the goal: on the problem of continuity and novelty from the standpoint of comparing Hegel's philosophy and Ihering's legal theory. Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences. 2017. No. 3. pp. 138–143.
- Gruzdev V.V. On the issue of the method of legal regulation. Modern law. 2024. No. 1. pp. 124–128.
- Zatolokin A.A. On the relationship between the norms of administrative-procedural and criminal-procedural law. Society and Law. 2020. No. 2 (72). pp. 105–108.
- Zyuzin V.A. On the systematicity and interconnectedness of judicial administrative-procedural principles. Administrative law and process. 2023. No. 1. pp. 39–45.
- Ivanenko Yu.G. Administrative proceedings: new foundations of law enforcement. Judge. 2015. No. 6 (54). pp. 13–17.
- Isakov N.P. The mechanism of legal regulation and the mechanism of law: a comparison of concepts. Law and Society. 2013. No. 2 (6). pp. 57–60.
- Komarov S.A. Law and behavior. Socialist legality. 1979. No. 11. pp. 98–101.
- Lesovaya T.S. Concretization of the principles of law as a means of increasing the degree of certainty of law. Russian justice. 2017. No. 1 (129). pp. 26–37.
- Luchnikov K.V. Activity as a philosophical category. Modern humanitarian research. 2009. No. 1 (26). pp. 58–60.
- Myznikova E.A. Objectives in Law and Legal Objectives: Categorical Relationship. Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2010. No. 6 (55). pp. 118–122.
- Osipov M.Yu. Concept and Features of Objectives and Methods of Legal Regulation. Modern Law. 2008. No. 11. pp. 14-17.
- Panova I.V., Panov A.B. Administrative-procedural law: subject and method. Public Law Today. 2023. No. 4 (18). pp. 67–74.
- Petryakov L.D. Quantitative Aspect of a Qualitative Concept in Philosophy and Specific Sciences. Prospects of Science. 2011. No. 3 (18). pp. 64–68.
- Sorokin V.D. On the structure of the subject of legal regulation. News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence. 1972. No. 6. pp. 73-80.
- Stakhov A.I. Administrative and administrative-procedural law: current problems and prospects. Russian justice. 2020. No. 4. pp. 104–107.
- Stepanenko R.F., Khamidullina F.I. Goal-setting in law: general legal and theoretical-methodological problems. State and Law. 2024. No. 10. pp. 45–54.
- Tabelsky S.V. Administrative proceedings in the system of administrative-procedural relations. Journal of administrative proceedings. 2022. No. 1. pp. 5–8.
- Shustrov D.G. Constitutional and legal regulation of the goals, objectives and functions of the state. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 11: Law. 2010. No. 1. pp. 139–150.
Supplementary files
