Justice with jury participation: current state and development prospects in the Russian Federation

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The institution of jurors exists for criminal proceedings in order to ensure the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the accused and their representatives. The institution of jurors has a fairly long history of formation and development in the Russian state. The current state of the institution of jurors also demonstrates the significant interest of civil society and the state in the development of this activity. In the legal literature, many opinions are expressed regarding the problems and prospects for the development of the institution of jurors, but many of them will only unreasonably complicate the existing system. The purpose of the presented study is to analyze the current state and prospects for the development of justice with the participation of jurors in the Russian Federation. The authors come to the conclusion that the current state of this institute is characterized by the presence of a number of current trends that characterize the scale and effectiveness of the application of relevant practice. Attention is focused on individual organizational problems in the functioning of courts with the participation of jurors. The prospects for the development of the institution of jurors in the Russian state are noted, and the priority task is to quickly resolve the problems of the shortage of juror candidates that exist in certain regions.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Dzhuletta Berova

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: berova-d@yandex.ru

Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor

Rússia, Nalchik

Leila Gelyakhova

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: Lel4993@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Organization of Law Enforcement Activities, police major

Rússia, Nalchik

Bibliografia

  1. Lebedev I.V. Review of the practice of overturning by appellate courts sentences passed on the basis of a jury verdict // Russian Justice. 2022. No. 10. P. 89–99.
  2. Magomedov G.B., Rashidov Sh.M. Problems of forming a jury in district (city) courts of general jurisdiction // Bulletin of the Russian Legal Academy. 2023. No. 2. P. 126–133.
  3. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in the consideration of criminal cases at first instance for 2022. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Statistika_2022_godovaya/F1-svod_vse_sudy-2022.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  4. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in the consideration of criminal cases at first instance for 2021. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/sudebnaya_statistika/2022/F1-svod_vse_sudy-2021.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  5. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in considering criminal cases on appeal for 2021. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/sudebnaya_statistika/2022/F6-svod_vse_sudy-2021.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  6. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in considering criminal cases on appeal for 2022. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Statistika_2022_godovaya/F6-svod_vse_sudy-2022.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  7. Sumin A.A. Problems of functioning of the court with the participation of jurors // Criminological Journal. 2023. No. 2. P. 144–146.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies