Justice with jury participation: current state and development prospects in the Russian Federation

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The institution of jurors exists for criminal proceedings in order to ensure the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the accused and their representatives. The institution of jurors has a fairly long history of formation and development in the Russian state. The current state of the institution of jurors also demonstrates the significant interest of civil society and the state in the development of this activity. In the legal literature, many opinions are expressed regarding the problems and prospects for the development of the institution of jurors, but many of them will only unreasonably complicate the existing system. The purpose of the presented study is to analyze the current state and prospects for the development of justice with the participation of jurors in the Russian Federation. The authors come to the conclusion that the current state of this institute is characterized by the presence of a number of current trends that characterize the scale and effectiveness of the application of relevant practice. Attention is focused on individual organizational problems in the functioning of courts with the participation of jurors. The prospects for the development of the institution of jurors in the Russian state are noted, and the priority task is to quickly resolve the problems of the shortage of juror candidates that exist in certain regions.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Dzhuletta Berova

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: berova-d@yandex.ru

Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Nalchik

Leila Gelyakhova

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Lel4993@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Department of Organization of Law Enforcement Activities, police major

俄罗斯联邦, Nalchik

参考

  1. Lebedev I.V. Review of the practice of overturning by appellate courts sentences passed on the basis of a jury verdict // Russian Justice. 2022. No. 10. P. 89–99.
  2. Magomedov G.B., Rashidov Sh.M. Problems of forming a jury in district (city) courts of general jurisdiction // Bulletin of the Russian Legal Academy. 2023. No. 2. P. 126–133.
  3. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in the consideration of criminal cases at first instance for 2022. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Statistika_2022_godovaya/F1-svod_vse_sudy-2022.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  4. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in the consideration of criminal cases at first instance for 2021. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/sudebnaya_statistika/2022/F1-svod_vse_sudy-2021.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  5. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in considering criminal cases on appeal for 2021. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/sudebnaya_statistika/2022/F6-svod_vse_sudy-2021.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  6. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in considering criminal cases on appeal for 2022. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Statistika_2022_godovaya/F6-svod_vse_sudy-2022.xls (access date: 09/15/2023).
  7. Sumin A.A. Problems of functioning of the court with the participation of jurors // Criminological Journal. 2023. No. 2. P. 144–146.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。
##common.cookie##