THE SOCIAL APPROACH IN ARCHAEOLOGY: YESTERDAY AND NOWADAYS
- Autores: Berseneva N.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- Institute of History and Archeology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, South Ural Division
- Edição: Volume 1, Nº 4 (2019)
- Páginas: 59-62
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-4654/article/view/529933
- ID: 529933
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
The article considers the current approaches to the social analysis of archaeological sites in Russian and foreign science. The dynamics in changing approaches from the beginning of the 20 century to the beginning of the 21 century has been traced. We should point out a shift in the focus of research from the investigation for general patterns of social development to a comprehensive study of the life of separate communities and even individuals. A great contribution to the development of new approaches was made by modern natural science methods - studies of ancient DNA and isotope analyzes.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
Natalia Berseneva
Institute of History and Archeology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, South Ural Division
Email: bersnatasha@mail.ru
candidate of Historical Sciences (07.00.06); leading researcher Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Bibliografia
- [Alekshin V.A. Social structure and funeral rite of ancient agricultural societies (based on archaeological materials of Central Asia and the Middle East). Leningrad: Nauka, 1986. 191 p.]
- [Alekshin V.A. Informative possibilities of archaeological burial sites. Archaeologicheskie vesti. 2016. Vol. 22. P. 174-186.]
- [Gulyaev V.I. Introduction to the discussion: Funeral rituals: structure, semantics and social interpretation (Part II). Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 84-85.]
- [Masson V.M. Economics and social structure of ancient societies (in the light of archeology data). Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.]
- [Melnik V.I. Funeral custom and funeral site. Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1993. Vol. 1. P. 94-97.]
- [Olkhovsky V.S. Funeral rites and sociological reconstruction. Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 85-98.]
- [Smirnov Yu.A. Labyrinth: The morphology of the deliberate burial. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 1997.]
- Binford L.R. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962. Vol. 28 (2). P. 217-225.
- Childe V.G. Changing Methods and Aims in Prehistory: Presidential Address for 1935. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. Vol. 1. P. 1-15.
- Childe V.G. Social Evolution. New-York: Henry Shuman, Ink., 1951. 184 p.
- Chilton E.S. From Postprocessualism to “Big Data”. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2014. Vol. 22. P. 35-40.
- Clark G. Archaeology and Society. Reconstructing the Prehistoric Past. London: Methuen & Co. LTD, 1957 (1939). 272 p.
- Hodder I. Reading the Past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. 221 р.
- Кradin N.N. A Panorama of Social Archaeology in Russia // Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past / Ed. L. Lozny. New York: Springer, 2011. P. 243-271.
- Kristiansen K. Towards a new paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2014. Vol. 22. P. 11-34.
- Renfrew A.C. Approaches to social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984. 430 p.
- Tainter J.R. Social inference and mortuary practices: an experiment in numerical classification. World Archaeology. 1975. No. 7. Р. 1-15.
Arquivos suplementares
