THE SOCIAL APPROACH IN ARCHAEOLOGY: YESTERDAY AND NOWADAYS


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article considers the current approaches to the social analysis of archaeological sites in Russian and foreign science. The dynamics in changing approaches from the beginning of the 20 century to the beginning of the 21 century has been traced. We should point out a shift in the focus of research from the investigation for general patterns of social development to a comprehensive study of the life of separate communities and even individuals. A great contribution to the development of new approaches was made by modern natural science methods - studies of ancient DNA and isotope analyzes.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Natalia Berseneva

Institute of History and Archeology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, South Ural Division

Email: bersnatasha@mail.ru
candidate of Historical Sciences (07.00.06); leading researcher Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

参考

  1. [Alekshin V.A. Social structure and funeral rite of ancient agricultural societies (based on archaeological materials of Central Asia and the Middle East). Leningrad: Nauka, 1986. 191 p.]
  2. [Alekshin V.A. Informative possibilities of archaeological burial sites. Archaeologicheskie vesti. 2016. Vol. 22. P. 174-186.]
  3. [Gulyaev V.I. Introduction to the discussion: Funeral rituals: structure, semantics and social interpretation (Part II). Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 84-85.]
  4. [Masson V.M. Economics and social structure of ancient societies (in the light of archeology data). Leningrad: Nauka, 1976.]
  5. [Melnik V.I. Funeral custom and funeral site. Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1993. Vol. 1. P. 94-97.]
  6. [Olkhovsky V.S. Funeral rites and sociological reconstruction. Rossiiskaya arkheologia. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 85-98.]
  7. [Smirnov Yu.A. Labyrinth: The morphology of the deliberate burial. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 1997.]
  8. Binford L.R. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962. Vol. 28 (2). P. 217-225.
  9. Childe V.G. Changing Methods and Aims in Prehistory: Presidential Address for 1935. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. Vol. 1. P. 1-15.
  10. Childe V.G. Social Evolution. New-York: Henry Shuman, Ink., 1951. 184 p.
  11. Chilton E.S. From Postprocessualism to “Big Data”. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2014. Vol. 22. P. 35-40.
  12. Clark G. Archaeology and Society. Reconstructing the Prehistoric Past. London: Methuen & Co. LTD, 1957 (1939). 272 p.
  13. Hodder I. Reading the Past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. 221 р.
  14. Кradin N.N. A Panorama of Social Archaeology in Russia // Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past / Ed. L. Lozny. New York: Springer, 2011. P. 243-271.
  15. Kristiansen K. Towards a new paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2014. Vol. 22. P. 11-34.
  16. Renfrew A.C. Approaches to social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984. 430 p.
  17. Tainter J.R. Social inference and mortuary practices: an experiment in numerical classification. World Archaeology. 1975. No. 7. Р. 1-15.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


##common.cookie##