Challenges for socio-economic security in the sphere of labor and their features in modern Russia

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Today, the field of challenges for the reproduction of national human potential is expanding, many of which lie in the sphere of labor. They make themselves felt not only at the level of macroeconomic proportions, but also at the micro level, characterizing the situation in the sphere of labor from the point of view of individuals or certain segments of the population. The article discusses the possibilities of applying the concept of socio-economic security of workers, developed by the International Labor Organization, to the study of the micro-level of the system of challenges in the world of work, which have emerged at the present stage of development of the economy and society. The advantage of this approach that it focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and problems faced by the majority of the working population not just the poorest. Seven aspects singled out that comprehensively characterize the socio-economic security of workers based on a combination of sociological and factual indicators. The study showed that currently available information on the state and dynamics of the social and economic security of workers is fragmentary and allows, to one degree or another, to assess only a part of these key aspects. It established that over the past year, in the changed economic realities, there has been an increase in the stability of the position of workers in terms of guarantees of employment and retention of employment. At the same time, the aspect of socio-economic security associated with the preservation and development of the professional and qualification potential of the working population continues to be among the most vulnerable. Ambiguous changes are taking place in the aspect of labor safety. To quickly identify vulnerable areas that require investment and measures to support the economically active population, it advisable to revive the monitoring of socio-economic security in the labor sphere.The article was prepared as part of participation in the International Scientific and Practical Conference «VII Senchagov Readings» on the topic: «The economic security of Russia: a response to new challenges», Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, March 23-24, 2023.

作者简介

Irina Soboleva

Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: irasobol@gmail.com

参考

  1. Автономов В.C., Автономов Ю.В. Общая теория «споров о методах» в экономической науке // Общественные науки и современность. – 2016. – № 4. – c. 5-20.
  2. Городнов А.В. Влияние миграционных процессов на развитие политики и экономики в России в условиях современного глобального кризиса // Экономическая безопасность. – 2022. – № 4. – c. 1565-1582. – doi: 10.18334/ecsec.5.4.116284.
  3. Караваева И.В., Лев М.Ю. Итоги проведения V Международной научно-практической конференции «Сенчаговские чтения» «Новые вызовы и угрозы экономике и социуму России» // Экономическая безопасность. – 2021. – № 3. – c. 853-887. – doi: 10.18334/ecsec.4.3.112368.
  4. Кубишин Е.С. Условия труда и новые формы нестандартной занятости в контексте развития человеческого потенциала России. - М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2023. – 50 c.
  5. Покида А.Н., Зыбуновская Н.В., Покида И.А. Вторичная занятость работающего населения на современном рынке труда // Экономическое развитие России. – 2023. – № 1. – c. 60-67.
  6. Рогозин Д. Тестирование вопросов о социальном самочувствии // Социальная реальность. – 2007. – № 2. – c. 97-113.
  7. Соболева И.В., Чадова Т.А. Социально-экономическая защищенность населения: ключевые аспекты и тенденции изменения // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. – 2013. – № 6. – c. 70-91.
  8. Соболева И.В. Социальное самочувствие предпринимателей и наемных работников в малом бизнесе // Социологические исследования. – 2019. – № 4. – c. 57-69. – doi: 10.31857/S013216250004586-7.
  9. Соболева И.В. Профессионально-квалификационный дисбаланс как вызов экономической и социальной безопасности // Экономическая безопасность. – 2022. – № 3. – c. 989-1008. – doi: 10.18334/ecsec.5.3.114898.
  10. ФНС отметила увеличение числа самозанятых россиян в 1,7 раза – до 6,56 млн. Interfax.ru. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.interfax.ru/business/880683 (дата обращения: 30.03.2023).
  11. Число зарегистрированных в России самозанятых достигло миллиона. Ria.ru. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ria.ru/20200828/samozanyatyy-1576410079.html (дата обращения: 30.03.2023).
  12. Городецкий А.Е., Караваева И.В., Лев М.Ю., Бухвальд Е.М., Казанцев С.В., Коломиец А.Г., Колпакова И.А., Иванов Е.А., Быковская Ю.В., Сазонова Е.С. Экономическая безопасность России в новой реальности. - Москва: Институт экономики Российской академии наук, 2021. – 325 c.
  13. Calaguas G.M. Satisfied and happy: establishing link between job satisfaction and subjective well-being // Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. – 2017. – № 1. – p. 104-111.
  14. Clark A., Georgellis Y. Back to baseline in Britain: adaptation in the British household panel survey // Economica. – 2013. – № 80. – p. 496-512. – doi: 10.1111 / ecca.12007.
  15. Decent Work and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. - Geneva: ILO, 2017.
  16. Easterlin R. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. / In R. Easterlin (ed.). Happiness in economics. - Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002. – 5-41 p.
  17. Economic Security for a Better World. - Geneva: ILO, 2004.
  18. Kaiser C., Oswald A.J. The scientific value of numerical measures of human feelings // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2022. – № 42. – doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210412119.
  19. Kopasker D., Montagna C., Bender K.A. Economic insecurity: A socioeconomic determinant of mental health // SSM - Population Health. – 2018. – p. 184-194. – doi: Economic insecurity: A socioeconomic determinant of mental health.
  20. Oparina E., Srisuma S. Analyzing Subjective Well-Being Data with Misclassification // Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. – 2022. – № 2. – p. 730-743. – doi: 10.1080/07350015.2020.1865169.
  21. Panayotakis C. Economic insecurity and social stability: an exploration of one of capitalisms vicious cycles. - New York (CUNY): CUNY Academic Works, 2000. – 41 p.
  22. Report on the EU contribution to the promotion of decent work in the world. – Brussels – 2008
  23. Shafique A. Addressing Economic Insecurity. RSANottingham Civic Exchange. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.thersa.org/reports/addressing-economic-insecurity.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Soboleva I.V., 2023

##common.cookie##