Mirror-image type III complete duplication of inferior vena cava: a distinct classification subtype or a variant of an existing one?
- Authors: Shershnev S.V.1, Yudina E.I.2, Ipatov V.V.3, Semenov A.A.3, Cheprakova V.A.3, Khugaeva O.D.3, Sutatov R.Z.3
-
Affiliations:
- City Hospital No. 4 of Sochi
- Children Hospital of Ussuriysk
- Military Medical Academy
- Issue: Vol 44, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 495-502
- Section: Discussion
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/RMMArep/article/view/677068
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar677068
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LZWPZR
- ID: 677068
Cite item
Abstract
The article presents a case of duplication of the inferior vena cava detected as an incidental finding in a 62-year-old patient who underwent computed tomography of the chest and abdomen for rectal cancer. Imaging revealed duplication of the inferior vena cava, with the left trunk exceeding both the right trunk and the aorta-crossing trunk in diameter. Both trunks were formed by anastomosing common iliac veins. Duplication of the left renal artery and vein was also noted; the lower left renal vein drained directly into the left trunk of the inferior vena cava, which then joined the upper renal vein and crossed the aorta as a single trunk before merging with the right inferior vena cava. The further course of the inferior vena cava to the right atrium was anatomically normal. The currently existing classification of inferior vena cava duplication does not provide a definitive description for the variant identified in this patient, creating difficulty in formulation of the medical conclusion. The observed anatomy most closely corresponded to Type III duplication, in which the right trunk normally exceeds the left and the aorta-crossing trunk in diameter. Based on the radiologic features and morphometric measurements of the duplicated inferior vena cava trunks, we assume that this represents a rare mirror-image anatomic variant of Type III duplication, in which the left trunk has the greatest diameter. Scientific data review revealed two additional reports describing similar duplication cases (three previously reported patients in total). In one publication this variant was suggested as a Type IV duplication, whereas in another, classification was not provided. Whether this anatomical pattern should be considered an independent Type IV duplication or a mirror-image modification of Type III remains debatable and merits discussion from an anatomical nomenclature standpoint. However, larger patient samples would be required, which is challenging owing to the rarity of the present anatomic variant.
Full Text
About the authors
Stanislav V. Shershnev
City Hospital No. 4 of Sochi
Email: st.xray@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0367-3318
SPIN-code: 8695-7123
Russian Federation, Sochi
Ekaterina I. Yudina
Children Hospital of Ussuriysk
Email: katerina-lazareva-98@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6100-7085
SPIN-code: 6225-9542
Russian Federation, Ussuriysk
Victor V. Ipatov
Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9799-4616
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAleksey A. Semenov
Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1977-7536
SPIN-code: 1147-3072
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgValentina A. Cheprakova
Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-9269-4896
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgOrnella D. Khugaeva
Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-4402-3485
Student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgRuslan Z. Sutatov
Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3780-2786
SPIN-code: 4789-7405
Student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Aljabri B, McDonald PS, Satin R, et al. Incidence of major venous and renal anomalies relevant to aortoiliac surgery as demonstrated by computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg. 2001;15(6):615–618. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0095-7
- Li W, Feng H, Jin L, et al. Duplication of the inferior vena cava: a case series. J Int Med Res. 2022;50(5):3000605221100771. doi: 10.1177/03000605221100771
- Mukhtarulina SV, Kaprin AD, Astashov VL, Aseeva IA. Variants of the inferior vena cava and its tributaries: the classification, embryogenesis, CT imaging and clinical significance in para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Oncourology. 2013;(3):10–16. EDN: RTDRQH
- Vishniakova MV, Drozdov IV, Demidov IN, et al. To X-ray diagnosis of some developmental malformations of the inferior cava. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 1998;(1):40–43. EDN: MPBDMB
- Kumar S, Singh S, Garg N. Right sided double inferior vena cava with obstructed retrocaval ureter: Managed with single incision multiple port laparoscopic technique using “Santosh Postgraduate Institute tacking ureteric fixation technique”. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(4):330–333. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.4.330
- Dudekula A, Prabhu SD. A rare case of right retrocavalureter with duplication of infrarenal IVC. Case Rep Radiol. 2014;2014:345712. doi: 10.1155/2014/345712
- Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Inferior vena cava in urology: importance of developmental abnormalities in clinical practice. Scientific World Journal. 2005;5:558–563. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2005.66
- Soundappan SV, Barker AP. Retrocaval ureter in children: a report of two cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(2):158–160. doi: 10.1007/s00383-003-1038-x
- Carrion H, Gatewood J, Politano V, et al. Retrocaval ureter: report of 8 cases and the surgical management. J Urol. 1979;121(4):514–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56849-4
- Kenawi MM, Williams DI. Circumcaval ureter: a report of four cases in children with a review of the literature and a new classification. Br J Urol. 1976;48(3):183–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1976.tb10197.x
- Rubinstein I, Cavalcanti AG, Canalini AF, et al. Left retrocaval ureter associated with inferior vena caval duplication. J Urol. 1999;162(4):1373–1374. PMID: 10492202
- Klinkhachorn PS, Ritz BK, Umstot MI, et al. Duplication of the inferior vena cava: evidence of a novel type IV. Folia Med Cracov. 2020;60(2):5–13. doi: 10.24425/fmc.2020.135009
- Vishnyakova MV, Melnichtnko ZhS, Goryachev SV. Aplasia of the inferior vena cava (case reports). Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2010;(1):85–89. EDN: NCDIHV
- Baeshko AA, Zhuk GV, Orlovskii YuN, et al. Deep vein thrombosis as the manifestation of congenital anomaly of inferior vena cava. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2006;(6):42–48. EDN: WCVLAR
- Baeshko AA, Zhuk GV, Orlovsky YuN, et al. Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: diagnosis and medical treatment. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2007;13(1):91–95. EDN: JWBDOF
- Mel’nichenko ZhS, Vishnyakova MV, Vishnyakova MV, et al. Congenital abnormalities of the inferior vena cava and its tributaries: their radiological diagnosis and clinical significance. Almanac of clinical medicine. 2015;(43):72–81. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2015-43-72-81 EDN: VCNXAP
- Yang C, Trad HS, Mendonca SM, Trad CS. Congenital inferior vena cava anomalies: a review of findings at multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Radiologia Brasileira. 2013;46(4):227–233. doi: 10.1590/S0100-39842013000400009
- Basnet KS, Dhungel S. Variation in inferior vena cava with persistence of left posterior cardinal vein. A case report. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(1):67–68. PMID: 21991708
- Jiménez R, Morant F. The importance of venous and renal anomalies for surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. In: Grundmann RT, editor. Diagnosis, screening and treatment of abdominal, thoracoabdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. IntechOpen; 2011. P. 269–275. doi: 10.5772/19103. doi: 10.5772/19103
- Byler TK, Disick GI, Sawczuk IS, Munver R. Vascular anomalies during laparoscopic renal surgery: incidence and management of left-sided inferior vena cava. JSLS. 2009;13(1):77–79. PMID: 19366547
- Sheth S, Fishman EK. Imaging of the inferior vena cava with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(5):1243–1251. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2133
- Rajaonatison LH, Andrianarimanitra HU, Ra-fanomezantsoa H, et al. Trombosis of a double vena cava associated with a retroperitoneal tumor. Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing. 2014;4(4):63–67. doi: 10.5430/jbgc.v4n4p63
- Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA, et al. Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics. 2000;20(3):639–652. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma09639
- Arey LB. Developmental anatomy: textbook and laboratory manual of embryology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1965. 680 p.
- Babu CS, Lalwani R, Kumar I. Right double inferior vena cava (IVC) with preaortic iliac confluence — case report and review of literature. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):130–132. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6785.4028
Supplementary files




