Email this article 
Methods of breast reconstruction after cancer
- Authors: Bit-Sava E.M.1, Belogurova M.B.2, Akhmedov R.M.1, Monogarova M.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- I. P. Pavlov State Medical University
- Pediatric Oncology and Hematology City Clinical Hospital N 31
- Issue: Vol 4, No 1 (2013)
- Pages: 49-52
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/pediatr/article/view/1185
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PED4149-52
- ID: 1185
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
Elena Mikhaylovna Bit-Sava
I. P. Pavlov State Medical University
Email: bit-sava@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Associate Professor. Department of Oncology with a Course of Radiation Diagnostics
Margarita Borisovna Belogurova
Pediatric Oncology and Hematology City Clinical Hospital N 31
Email: deton.hospital31@inbox.ru
MD, PhD, Professor. Department of Oncology with a Course of Radiation Diagnostics
Ruslan Merzaliyevich Akhmedov
I. P. Pavlov State Medical University
Email: Little-doctor1989@yandex.ru
intern doctor. Department of Oncology with a Course of Radiation Diagnostics
Mariya Aleksandrovna Monogarova
I. P. Pavlov State Medical University
Email: monomarishka@mail.ru
intern doctor, Department of Surgery
References
- Andree C., Munder B. I., Seidenstuecker K. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with DIEP flap after breast-conserving therapy. // Med. Sci. Monit. — 2012. — Vol. 18(12). — P. CR716–720.
- Asseirsson K. S., Rasheed T., McCulley S. J. at al. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery // EJSO. — 2005. — Vol. 31. — P. 817–823.
- Casey W. J., Rebecca A. M., Silverman A., Macias L. H. et al. Etiology of Breast Masses after Autologous Breast Reconstruction // Ann. Surg. Oncol. — 2012, September 1.
- Cederna P. S., Yates W. R., Chang P., Cram A. E., Ricciardelli E. J. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction // Ann. Plast. Surg. — 1995. — Vol. Nov. 35(5). — P. 458–468.
- Chang D. W., Reece G. P., Wang B. et al. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. — 2000. — Vol. 105. — P. 2374–2380.
- Chang D. W., Wang B., Robb G. L. et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. — 2000. — Vol. 105. — P. 1640–1648.
- Craig E. S., Walker M. E., Salomon J., Fusi S. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola-sparing mastectomy // Microsurgery. — 2012. — Vol. Aug 18, doi: 10.1002/micr.22020.
- De Andrade Urban C. New classification for oncoplastic procedures in surgical practice // Breast. — 2008. — Vol. 17. — P. 321–322.
- Gendy R. K., Able J. A., Rainsbury R. M. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery // Br. J. Surg. — 2003. — Vol. 90. — P. 433–439.
- Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction: an experimental study and clinical case report // Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. — 1979. — Vol. 13. — P. 423–427.
- Schneider L. F., Chen C. M., Stolier A. J. et al. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Free-Flap Reconstruction in the Large Ptotic Breast // Ann. Plast. Surg. — 2012. — Vol. Sep 7.
Supplementary files
