Design of singlesided linear induction motor for lowspeed Maglev vehicle in 160 km/h and variable slip frequency control
 Authors: He Y.^{1}, Wang Y.^{1}, Lu Q.^{1}, Zhang L.^{2}, Liang F.^{2}

Affiliations:
 College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University
 CRRC Zhuzhou Electric CO., LTD
 Issue: Vol 4, No 2 (2018)
 Pages: 120128
 Section: Original papers
 URL: https://journals.ecovector.com/transsyst/article/view/10186
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/transsyst201842120128
 Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background: The midlow speed Maglev train adopts the singlesided linear induction motors (SLIMs) as drive part, of which design and control method has become research hotspot when the velocity is elevated from 120 km/h to 160 km/h.
Aim: For SLIMs applied in 160 km/h lowspeed maglev train, the design scheme is introduced and then a novel variable slip frequency control method is proposed.
Methods of the studies: This control method adopts low slip frequency at startup to produce large starting traction force and high slip frequency during high velocity area to obtain great power. The influence to the normal force is also investigated.
Results: With this method, the weight of the system can be effectively reduced and the lightweight design of SLIM is realized.
Conclusion: The novel variable slip frequency control method meets the requirement of both high starting acceleration and enough residual acceleration for 160 km/h midlow speed maglev train.
Full Text
INTRODUCTION
The Changsha mediumlow speed maglev line is the first commercial operation line in China and the longest one in the world. Its designed velocity is 120 km/h, and the running velocity is 100 km/h. During its twoyear long commercial operation since May 6^{th}, 2016, the longest mileage has reached 400 000 km and the punctuality rate has reached 99.8 %, which has set a good exemplary role. After the successful operation of the Changsha maglev line, the intercity transportation with higher speed class (160 km/h) by adopting the maglev train is put on the agenda. This paper presents the design of SLIMs for mid–low speed maglev train with velocity 160 km/h and optimizes the force performance from the aspect of control method.
BASIC PARAMETERS OF MAGLEV TRAINS IN CHANGSHA LINE
The midlow maglev train in Changsha line consists of three coaches. Each coach covers five suspension frames, one converter and ten SLIMs. The basic parameters of the train and the converter are listed in Table 1. Ten SLIMs are equally divided into two groups, which are connected in parallel. To five SLIMs in one group, the phase windings connected in series are transposed to reduce the end effect, as shown in Fig. 1. As it can be seen, three phase windings are Y connected.
Table 1. Basic parameters
Item  Parameters  Value 
Vehicle  Voltage of power network /V  DC1000~1800 
Track gauge /mm  1860  
Running velocity/ km/h  100  
Design velocity / km/h  120  
Coach number  3  
Vehicle mass（AW2）/t  30  
Starting acceleration /m/s^{2}  1.0  
Average acceleration/m/s^{2}  0.4  
Residual acceleration/m/s^{2}  0.1  
Number of suspension frame  5  
Converter  Input voltage /V  DC1000~1800 
Rated line voltage/ V  1100  
Rated maximum current /A  2×340  
Rated Continuous current /A  2×240 
Fig. 1. The winding connection of five SLIMs in one group
Design analysis of SLIMs for 160km/h maglev train
2.1 Traction force requirement
The 160 km/h maglev train also adopts three coaches. Its resistance force can be calculated by adopting the resistance formula of the Changsha maglev line, which includes three components as follows.
1) Magnetic resistance force
The magnetic reluctance force D_{m} can be calculated by piecewise formula as follows:
${D}_{m}=\left\{\begin{array}{l}3,354Wv\\ \left(18,22+0,074v\right)W\end{array}\right.\begin{array}{l}v<5,6\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\\ v>5,6\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\end{array}$ , (1)
where W is the vehicle mass (t), and v is the running velocity (m/s).
2) Relay resistance force
The relay resistance force D_{c} is almost constant, which value is 41.67 N.
3) Aerodynamic resistance force
The aerodynamic resistance force D_{a} mainly depends on the velocity and coach number.
${D}_{a}=\left(1,652+0,572N\right){v}^{2}$, (2)
where N is the coach number.
The total resistance force D is the sum of three former components. The traction force F is obtained through the total resistance force and acceleration.
$F={D}_{m}+{D}_{c}+{D}_{a}+Wa=D+Wa$, (3)
where a is the acceleration.
When the running velocity is increased from 120 km/h to 160 km/h and the minimum residual acceleration is maintained at 0.1 m/s^{2}, the power increases by 66.7 %, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Power requirement of the 160 km/h maglev train
Design velocity  120 km/h  160 km/h 
Vehicle mass / t  30  32 
Total resistance force / kN  5.65  8.76 
Traction force/per motor / kg  50  62.5 
Vehicle power / kW  490  816.7 
2.2 Basic parameters of traction system
As the vehicle power increases, the number of converters or the capacity of single IGBT needs to be increased. Obviously, it is more economical to increase the IGBT capacity. The maximum current of available IGBT with matching voltage level is 2*450 A. Therefore, the power can increase by 32 % in comparison with the Changsha lines with IGBT of 2*340 A maximum current.
Since the IGBT capacity does not increase by 66.7 %, it means the starting traction force should be reduced or the volume should be improved to reduce the starting current. According to the consultation with the OEM, the length of SLIM can be increased from 1820 mm to 2020 mm. In addition, the starting traction force is reduced since the starting acceleration is changed from 1.0 m/s^{2} to 0.8 m/s^{2}, which meets the start acceleration of the general intercity vehicle.
The number of modules per train and the selection between available mode (fivestring doubleparallel) and new mode (twostring fiveparallel mode) need to be determined. The most economical and reliable method is to keep the original vehicle structure.
2.4 Design requirements
Based on the foundation of the Changsha maglev line, the main design requirements of the 160 km/h maglev train are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Power requirement of the 160km/h maglev train
Vehicle mass (AW2) / t  32 
Mechanical air gap of SLIMs / mm  12 
Length of the SLIM / mm  2020 
Converter input current / A  2×450 
Maximum vehicle velocity / (km/h)  160 
Average starting acceleration(0~70 km/h) / (m/s^{2})  ≥0.8 
Average acceleration (0160 km/h) / (m/s^{2})  ≥ 0.4 
Residual acceleration (160 km/h) / (m/s^{2})  ≥0.1 
The design of SLIMs
3.1 Basic parameters
Based on the former analysis, the SLIMs, JX170, applied in the 160 km/h maglev train is designed, shown in Fig. 2. The train has the original fivemodule structure and SLIMs per coach with five strings two parallel connection mode. The motor basic parameters comparison with SLIM of the Changsha maglev line, JX130, are listed in Table 4.
Fig. 2. JX170 SLIM
Table 4. Basic parameters comparison of two SLIMs
SLIM type  JX130  JX170 
Rated voltage/V  220  
Pole number  8  
Thickness of the aluminum plate/mm  4  
Width of Fshaped rail/mm  220  
Starting current/A  340  450 
Rated current/A  240  360 
Starting force/N  3234  2764 
Primary mass/kg  200  215 
Pole pitch/mm  202.5  225 
Primary length/mm  1820  2020 
Air gap/mm  13  12 
3.2 Control settings
The control method of the SLIMs for magnetic levitation trains is different from that of the induction traction motor for subways. First, for simple control, the SLIMs for magnetic levitation trains generally use constant current and constant slip frequency control method. Second, SLIMs must consider the effect of the normal force. Therefore, the suitable slip frequency f_{2} is important parameter for SLIMs.
With the equivalent circuit of an induction motor, the influence of slip frequency on SLIMs performance can be analyzed.
Normally, constant current control method is used during startup. Their relationship is shown as follow. Apparently, the traction force is inversely proportional to the slip frequency, f_{2}.
${F}_{x}=\frac{m{R}_{2}^{\text{'}}{\left({I}_{2}^{\text{'}}\right)}^{2}}{2\pi {f}_{1}s}=\frac{m{R}_{2}^{\text{'}}{\left({I}_{2}^{\text{'}}\right)}^{2}}{2\pi {f}_{2}}$ , (4)
when the starting acceleration of the train reaches 0.8 m/s^{2}, the traction force per SLIM is 2567 N. Under this condition, the maximum slip frequency f_{2} should be 15.7 Hz. If adopting the control method of constant slip frequency, the traction force at maximum velocity is 710N per SLIM and the residual acceleration of the train at 160km/h is 0.13 m/s^{2}.
At high velocity, the SLIM already adopts full voltage. The SLIM torqueslip curve is similar with inductionmachine. As can be seen from Fig. 3, during the motor region, the higher the f_{2}, the higher the slip, and the larger the traction force is.
Fig. 3. Inductionmachine torqueslip curve during whole operation area.
When the required remaining acceleration is 0.1 m/s^{2}, the traction force per SLIM is 612 N. To this required traction force, the minimum slip frequency f2 is 13.7 Hz. If keeping this slip frequency as constant value, the starting traction force can be increased up to 2764 kg.
In order to verify the former traction force at startup and maximum velocity, the 3D model of JX170 is erected by 3D FEM. For slip frequency 13.7 Hz, the calculated thrust force at startup is 2720 N. For slip frequency 15.7 Hz, the calculated thrust force at maximum velocity is 753 N. Compared with the predicted results of equivalent circuit method, the errors are 44 N and 43 N under two conditions respectively. Apparently, the results of equivalent circuit method are reasonable.
Therefore, the slip frequency should between 13.7 to 15.7 Hz. The traction characteristics are shown in Fig. 4 with the slip frequency values of 13.7 Hz and 15.7 Hz, respectively. And the normal force is considered acceptable.
Fig.4. The traction characteristics with the constant current slip frequency 13.7 Hz and 15.7 Hz
Variable slip frequency control method
From former analysis, it can be deduced that the SLIM performance of high velocity or low velocity is inevitably sacrificed when a constant current and constant slip control method is applied. However, this can be avoided if variable slip control method is adopted in SLIMs. Since they start with a lower starting frequency to produce larger starting traction force, and operate with higher slip frequency to obtain larger power at high velocity area, the capacity can be fully utilized.
To JX170 SLIMs, at the low velocity, the slip frequency 13.7 Hz is adopted to increase the starting traction force. At high velocity, the slip frequency is increased to 17.2 Hz, which increases the traction force. The traction characteristics are shown in Fig. 5. This method considers the starting acceleration and the residual acceleration of high velocity, which increases the starting capability and reduces the starting distance.
When the variable slip frequency control method is used, the traction characteristics of the train can only be within the envelope to meet a certain overload capacity. Moreover, it should not be far away from the envelope to make full use of motor capability as shown Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Maximum traction force curve
With slip frequency change from 13.7 Hz to 17.2 Hz , the residual acceleration is increased by 70 % compared with the constant slip frequency control method, and then the acceleration time is reduced by 17 % and the acceleration distance is reduced by 22 %, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Starting performance of variable slip frequency control method
Сontrol method  Constant slip frequency  Variable slip frequency  Сhange rate 
Startup frequency /Hz  13.70  13.7 

Start acceleration/(m/s^{2})  0.86  0.86 

Endup slip frequency /Hz  13.7  17.2 

Residual acceleration/(m/s^{2})  0.10  0.17  +70 % 
Average acceleration/(m/s^{2})  0.40  0.48  +20 % 
Acceleration time /s  110.6  91.7  17 % 
Acceleration distance/m  3369  2613  22 % 
CONCLUSION
This paper presents the design of SLIMs for mid–low speed maglev train with velocity 160 km/h, which meets the performance requirement of the 160 km/h midlow speed maglev train. It has the characteristics of derivative design and economical reliability.
It also proposes a variable slip frequency control method for the SLIM. With a lower slip frequency at startup, the SLIM has a larger starting traction force. At high velocity, a higher slip frequency is used, and a larger motor power is realized. The train acceleration performance is optimized without additional space, mass and cost. This proposed control method can also be applied to other maglev trains driven by SLIMs.
About the authors
Yunfeng He
College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University
Author for correspondence.
Email: heyunfeng@crrcelectric.com
ORCID iD: 0000000299513919
Ph.D, senior engineer
China, HangzhouYouSheng Wang
College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University
Email: eewangys@zju.edu.cn
ORCID iD: 0000000280814957
bachelor, Professor
China, HangzhouQinfen Lu
College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University
Email: luqinfen@zju.edu.cn
ORCID iD: 0000000234525564
Ph.D, Professor
China, HangzhouLei Zhang
CRRC Zhuzhou Electric CO., LTD
Email: zhanglei@crrcelectric.com
ORCID iD: 0000000308409401
master, engineer
China, Zhuzhou, HunanFang Liang
CRRC Zhuzhou Electric CO., LTD
Email: fangliang@crrcelectric.com
ORCID iD: 0000000188749208
master, engineer
China, Zhuzhou, HunanReferences
 Yan G L. The linear motor powered transportation development and application in China Proc. IEEE. 2009;97(11):18721880. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2030245
 Gieras JF, Dawson GE, Eastham AR. Performance calculation for singlesided linear induction motors with a doublelayer reaction rail under constant current excitation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1986;lM22(1):5462.
 Im DH, Park SC, Im JW. Design of singlesided linear induction motor using the finite element method and SUMT. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1993;29(2):17621766.
 Dawson G, Easthma AR, Gieras JF, Ong R, Ananthasivam K. Design of linear induction drives by field analysis and finiteelement techniques. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1986;IA22(5):865873.
 Ye YY. The Theory and Application of Linear Motor. Beijing, China: Mech. Ind. Press, Jun. 2000.
 Ham SH, Lee SG, Kim KS, Cho SY, Jin CS, Lee J. Study on reduction of transverse edge effect of singlesided linear induction motor for transportation system. Proc. Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. Syst., Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 2009, p. 1–4.
 Lv G, Li Q, Liu ZM, Fan Y, Li GG. The analytical calculation of the thrust and normal force and force analyses for linear induction motor. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Sig. Process., Beijing, China, Dec. 2008, p. 27952799.
 Gieras JF, Dawson GE, Eastham AR. A new longitudinal end effect factor for linear induction motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 1987;EC2(1):152159.
 Lu JY, Ma WM. Research on end effect of linear induction machine for highspeed industrial transportation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2011;39(1):116120. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2085089
 Kim DK, Kwon BI. A novel equivalent circuit model of linear induction motor based on finite element analysis and its coupling with external circuits. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2006;42(5):34073409. doi: 10.13334/j.02588013.pcsee.2015.15.026
 Yamaguchi T, Kawase Y, Yoshida M, Saito Y, Ohdachi Y. 3D finite element analysis of a linear induction motor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2001;l.37(5):366836741.
 Lv G, Zeng D, Zhou T, Liu Z. Investigation of forces and secondary losses in linear induction motor with the solid and laminated back iron secondary for metro. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017;64(6):43824390. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2565442
 Lu Q, Li Y, Ye Y, Zhu ZQ. Investigation of forces in linear induction motor under different slip frequency for lowspeed maglev application. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers, 2013;28(1):45153. doi: 10.13334/j.02588013.pcsee.2015.15.026
Supplementary files
Statistics
Views
Abstract: 1081
PDF (English): 397
Citedby
 Nikitin VV, Strepetov VM. Linear asynchronous traction drive in urban rail and maglev transport systems. Transportation Systems and Technology. 2020;6(4):5. doi: 10.17816/transsyst202064524