Functional states of the hip joint in the early postoperative period with direct anterior arthroplasty with a skin incision «bikini»

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of coxarthrosis at age of 18 years and older has reached 13% in recent years. Total hip arthroplasty is considered the gold standard for the treatment of late-stage coxarthrosis and other hip pathologies. Due to the more frequent intervention performed in recent years and increasing patient expectations, the choice of optimal surgical access will improve the outcomes of the treatment method. However, given the lack of statistical data on the qualitative difference in the postoperative condition of patients using different surgical accesses during hip arthroplasty, there is no consensus on the optimal access choice.

AIM: To carry out a comparative assessment of the hip joint functional states in the postoperative period after endoprosthesis using direct anterior and anterolateral accesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 163 patients with coxarthrosis, 71 men and 92 women, who were subsequently divided into 2 groups: the comparison and the main one. To investigate the effectiveness of the proposed approach to endoprosthesis, the results were evaluated by dynamic assessment of joint function using the Barthel scale, the Stand and Walk test, the Leken algo-functional index, the Harris Hip Score scale, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. The Statistical analysis was performed using StatSoft Statistica 10 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software packages. Intergroup comparisons of quantitative indicators were performed using the Mann-Whitney rank test in case of nonparametric distribution of indicator values and/or significant difference in groups.

RESULTS: The findings showed that in the postoperative period, the use of direct anterior access in hip arthroplasty was associated with faster recovery of hip joint functionality and shorter inpatient stay compared with anterolateral access, which was confirmed by statistically significant intergroup differences.

CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy from using the direct anterior access can be seen in statistically significantly (p <0.05) higher scores on the Barthel self-care scale, the results of the "Stand up and walk" test 2–6 weeks after surgery, as well as better dynamics of the Harris Hip Score, Leken Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire 1–3 months after hip arthroplasty.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ivan K. Eremin

LLC «Neuro-clinic»

Email: eremindoctor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0992-0706
SPIN-code: 9019-4184

Orthopedic Traumatologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Armen A. Daniliyants

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: armendts@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6692-0975

Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Egor V. Ogarev

National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov

Email: evogarev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0621-1047

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Radiologist, Senior Researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nikolay V. Zagorodniy

National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: zagorodniy51@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6736-9772
SPIN-code: 6889-8166

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding member of RAS, Traumatologist-Orthopedist

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Osteoarthritis. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/basics/osteoarthritis.htm. Accessed: 11.11.2021.
  2. Galushko EA, Nasonov EL. Prevalence of rheumatic diseases in Russia. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2018;46(1):32–9. (In Russ). doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2018-46-1-32-39
  3. Waddell J, Johnson K, Hein W, et al. Orthopaedic practice in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: results from the Global Orthopaedic Registry (GLORY). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(9 Suppl):5–13.
  4. Tikhilov PM, Shubnyakov II, editors. Guidelines for hip joint surgery. St. Petersburg: P.P. Vreden RNIITO; 2014. Vol. I. 368 p. (In Russ).
  5. Realyvasquez J, Singh V, Shah AK, et al. The direct anterior approach to the hip: a useful tool in experienced hands or just another approach? Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00104-5
  6. McLawhorn AS, Christ AB, Morgenstern R, et al. Prospective evaluation of the posterior tissue envelope and anterior capsule after anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(3):767–773. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.045
  7. Yue C, Kang P, Pei F. Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(50):e2126. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000002126
  8. Fullam J, Theodosi PG, Charity J, et al. A scoping review comparing two common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty. BMC Surg. 2019;(19):32. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0493-9
  9. Ries MD. Relationship between functional anatomy of the hip and surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2019;42(4):356–363. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190624-03
  10. Pietrzak JRT, Maharaj Z, Cakic JN. Good long-term outcomes for direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in South Africa. J Orthop. 2020;(22):352–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.014
  11. Rahm S, Tondelli T, Steinmetz S, et al. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: analysis of a consecutive series of 275 hips with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(6):1132–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.062
  12. Cichos KH, Mabry SE, Spitler CA, et al. Comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty performed for femoral neck fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35(1):41–48. doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001883
  13. Van der Sijp MPL, van Delft D, Krijnen P, et al. Surgical approaches and hemiarthroplasty outcomes for femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1617– 1627.e9. Epub 2017 Dec 29. Erratum in: J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(2):603–604. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.029
  14. Kunkel ST, Sabatino MJ, Kang R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(2):217–232. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2033-6
  15. Makhdom AM, Hozack WJ. Direct anterior versus direct lateral hip approach in total hip arthroplasty with the same perioperative protocols one year post fellowship training. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03716-6
  16. Xu Z, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: more indications and advantages than we found. Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00130-x
  17. March LM, Barcenilla AL, Cross MJ, et al. Costs and outcomes of total hip and knee joint replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(10):1235–42. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0891-3
  18. Moerenhout K, Derome P, Laflamme GY, et al. Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Can J Surg. 2020;63(5):E412–E417. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012019
  19. Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M, et al. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(1):36–42. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.001784
  20. Grimmig H, Melzer C, Ludwig FJ, et al. Der routinemässige Einsatz des Lequesne-Index zur Ergebnismessung in der orthopädischen Rehabilitation bei Hüft- und Knieerkrankungen [Using the Lequesne questionnaires for patients with hip and knee disabilities in daily routine to reflect the quality of outcome in rehabilitation]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002;140(4):452–9. (In German). doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33399
  21. Mjaaland KE, Kivle K, Svenningsen S, et al. Do postoperative results differ in a randomized trial between a direct anterior and a direct lateral approach in THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(1):145–155. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000439

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies