Activating thoracolumbar orthoses as a non-pharmacological component in the treatment of vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background: The duration and mode of use of activating thoracolumbar orthoses for low-energy vertebral fractures remains a subject of debate.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of an activating thoracolumbar orthosis in women with a fracture due to osteoporosis on pain, strength of the back and abdominal muscles when worn throughout the day and for up to 2 months.

Materials and methods: Prospective single-center cohort study. Muscle strength was assessed using the Kraus-Weber test, the modified SSD test (strength-static-dynamic), the “Get up from a chair 5 times with your arms crossed on your chest” test, pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Nonparametric statistics were used, Wilcoxon test for pairwise comparisons, and Friedman test for cross-tabulation.

Results: After 2 months, there was a significant increase in the strength of the lower abdominal muscles (p=0.008), all abdominal muscles (p=0.016), upper back muscles (p=0.018), all back muscles in the strength-static-dynamic test (p=0.033) and significant reduction in pain (p=0.016).

Conclusion: The use of the ORLETT OBS-300 activating orthosis, worn continuously throughout the day and for up to 2 months, is an effective method of non-pharmacological treatment of low-energy fractures due to osteoporosis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Svetlana S. Rodionova

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow

Author for correspondence.
Email: rod06@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2726-8758
https://www.cito-priorov.ru/doctors/Rodionova-Svetlana-Semenovna/?sphrase_id=7197

Prof.
Dr. Sci. (Med.)
Head of the Scientific and Clinical Center of Osteoporosis

Russian Federation

A. A Panov

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow

Email: panovdoc@gmail.com

Liubov V. Rudinskaya

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Moscow

Email: vishnia103@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-2620-9504
Russian Federation

References

  1. Kaijser Alin C, Uzunel E, Grahn Kronhed AC, Alinaghizadeh H, Salminen H. Effect of treatment on back pain and back extensor strength with a spinal orthosis in older women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2019;14(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0555-0
  2. Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, et al.; IMPACT Study Group. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(4):557–63. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041214
  3. Li M, Law SW, Cheng J, Kee HM, Wong MS. A comparison study on the efficacy of SpinoMed® and soft lumbar orthosis for osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(4):270–6. doi: 10.1177/0309364614528204
  4. Al-Sari UA, Tobias JH, Clark EM. Self-reported everyday physical activities in older people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(1):19–29. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4287-6
  5. Sinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, et al. Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10-year follow-up of postmenopausal women. Bone. 2002;30(6):836–41. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00739-1
  6. Rzewuska M, Ferreira M, McLachlan AJ, Machado GC, Maher CG. The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(4):702–14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3821-5
  7. Lorbergs AL, O'Connor GT, Zhou Y, et al. Severity of Kyphosis and Decline in Lung Function: The Framingham Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(5):689–694. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw124
  8. Katzman WB, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, et al. Targeted spine strengthening exercise and posture training program to reduce hyperkyphosis in older adults: results from the study of hyperkyphosis, exercise, and function (SHEAF) randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(10):2831–2841. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4109-x
  9. Lorbergs AL, Murabito JM, Jarraya M, et al. Thoracic Kyphosis and Physical Function: The Framingham Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(10):2257–2264. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15038
  10. Katzman WB, Parimi N, Gladin A, et al. Sex differences in response to targeted kyphosis specific exercise and posture training in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1862-0
  11. Pathological fractures complicating osteoporosis: clinical recommendations [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cito-priorov.ru/cito/files/Патологические_переломы_осл_остеопороз.pdf?ysclid=lzbmbew4lp603589775 (In Russ).
  12. Burke TN, França FJ, Meneses SR, Pereira RM, Marques AP. Postural control in elderly women with osteoporosis: comparison of balance, strengthening and stretching exercises. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(11):1021–31. doi: 10.1177/0269215512442204
  13. Jacobs E, Senden R, McCrum C, et al. Effect of a semirigid thoracolumbar orthosis on gait and sagittal alignment in patients with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:671–680. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S199853
  14. van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, et al.; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(suppl 2):S169–91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2
  15. Newman M, Minns Lowe C, Barker K. Spinal Orthoses for Vertebral Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(6):1013–25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.108
  16. Alin CK, Frisendahl N, Kronhed AG, Salminen H. Experiences of using an activating spinal orthosis in women with osteoporosis and back pain in primary care. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00754-z
  17. Pieroh P, Spiegl UJA, Völker A, et al.; Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. Spinal Orthoses in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Quality Assessment. Global Spine J. 2023;13(1_suppl):59S–72S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221130048
  18. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of a new spinal orthosis on posture, trunk strength, and quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(3):177–86. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000113403.16617.93
  19. Valentin GH, Pedersen LN, Maribo T. Wearing an active spinal orthosis improves back extensor strength in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(3):232–8. doi: 10.1177/0309364613497393
  20. Hosseinabadi M, Kamyab M, Azadinia F, Sarrafzadeh J. Effect of a Spinomed orthosis on balance performance, spinal alignment, joint position sense and back muscle endurance in elderly people with hyperkyphotic posture: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020;44(4):234–244. doi: 10.1177/0309364620923816
  21. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, et al. Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(1):82–7. doi: 10.1007/s00774-009-0107-1
  22. Kweh BTS, Lee HQ, Tan T, et al. The Role of Spinal Orthoses in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of the Elderly Population (Age 60 Years or Older): Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2021;11(6):975–987. doi: 10.1177/2192568220948036

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.