From acquired flatfoot to progressive collapsing foot deformity: a review of classifications
- Authors: Mursalov A.K.1, Ivanov K.S.1, Dzyuba A.M.1, Rogova M.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Priorov National Medical Research Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics
- Issue: Vol 32, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 698-706
- Section: Reviews
- Submitted: 18.09.2024
- Accepted: 03.07.2025
- Published: 14.08.2025
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/636196
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto636196
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SQRBBE
- ID: 636196
Cite item
Abstract
Flatfoot deformity has historically been a complex problem, characterized by a combination of multiplanar deviations. To date, a wide range of classifications has been proposed, based on various principles—from posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, historically considered the primary cause of deformity, to segmentation by foot regions and specific types of deformities within them. A major challenge lies in the fact that foot deformity, as described below, does not follow a linear pattern, and various deformity combinations frequently occur, complicating its systematization. The work aimed to analyze existing and most widely used classifications of flatfoot deformity that have been proposed at different times and remain relevant in foot and ankle surgery, with emphasis on their features and limitations. A scientific data review was conducted using PubMed, eLIBRARY.RU, and CyberLeninka databases with the search terms классификация плосковальгусной деформации / classification of flatfoot deformity and flatfoot deformity. A total of 12 sources were selected for the review. The analyzed scientific data covered the period from 1988 to 2025. In the course of the review, an evident trend was identified toward more detailed segmentation of the deformity by different regions of the foot and the types of abnormalities within them. We observed a shift from hierarchical to faceted classifications, reflecting attempts to encompass the wide variability of deformities across all foot regions and their combinations encountered in clinical practice. And despite numerous attempts at systematization, there is still no universal classification that fully reflects all aspects of flatfoot deformity and satisfies the needs of clinicians in determining patient management strategies for this condition.
Full Text

About the authors
Anatoly K. Mursalov
Priorov National Medical Research Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Author for correspondence.
Email: tamerlanmursalov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3829-5524
SPIN-code: 9035-8198
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowKonstantin S. Ivanov
Priorov National Medical Research Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: 8orthocito@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-1507-0606
SPIN-code: 2384-9328
Russian Federation, Moscow
Alexey M. Dzyuba
Priorov National Medical Research Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: minzdrav2008@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7718-1872
Russian Federation, Moscow
Mariya S. Rogova
Priorov National Medical Research Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: m.rogova24@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7954-503X
SPIN-code: 7472-9278
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(239):196–206.
- Myerson MS. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393–405.
- Jeng C, Myerson M. The uses of tendon transfers to correct paralytic deformity of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2004;9(2):319–37. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2004.03.003
- Cifuentes-De la Portilla C, Larrainzar-Garijo R, Bayod J. Analysis of the main passive soft tissues associated with adult acquired flatfoot deformity development: A computational modeling approach. J Biomech. 2019;84:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.047
- Mizel MS, Temple HT, Scranton PE Jr, et al. Role of the peroneal tendons in the production of the deformed foot with posterior tibial tendon deficiency. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(5):285–9. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000502
- Yeap J, Birch R, Singh D. Long-term results of tibialis posterior tendon transfer for drop-foot. Int Orthop. 2001;25(2):114–8. doi: 10.1007/s002640100229
- Yeap JS, Singh D, Birch R. A method for evaluating the results of tendon transfers for foot drop. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(383):208–13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200102000-00024
- Bluman EM, Myerson MS. Stage IV Posterior Tibial Tendon Rupture. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2007;12(2):341–62, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2007.03.004
- Lalevée M, Barbachan Mansur NS, Lee HY, et al. A comparison between the Bluman et al. and the progressive collapsing foot deformity classifications for flatfeet assessment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2023;143(3):1331–1339. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04279-z
- Raikin SM, Winters BS, Daniel JN. The RAM classification: a novel, systematic approach to the adult-acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(2):169–81. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2012.03.002
- Patent RUS № 2576087/ 27.02.2016. Zagorodnij NV, Protsko VG, Tikhonov OA, Chernyshev AA, Olejnik AV. Method of determining degree of plano-valgus deformity. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2576087C1/ru (In Russ.) EDN: QIYNJW
- Myerson MS, Thordarson DB, Johnson JE, et al. Classification and Nomenclature: Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(10):1271–1276. doi: 10.1177/1071100720950722
Supplementary files
