Email this article Experience in use of Wagner SL Revision Stem for Revision Hip Arthroplasty
- Authors: Kavalerskiy G.M1, Murylyov V.Y.1, Rukin Y.A1, Kholodaev M.Y.2, Elizarov P.M1
-
Affiliations:
- First Moscow state medical university named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia
- City clinical hospital named after S.P. Botkin, Moscow, Russia
- Issue: Vol 21, No 2 (2014)
- Pages: 40-45
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/47578
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto20140240-45
- ID: 47578
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Experience in revision hip arthroplasty with change of femoral stem was analyzed for 165 patients. In 107 operations (64.8%) Wagner SL Revision Stems were used, in the rest of cases - femoral components of other manufacturers. Distribution of patients by femoral defect type by Paprovsky was the following: I type - 27 patients, II type - 75, IIIA type - 59, IIIB and IV type - 4 patients. Good results at use of Wagner SL Revision Stems and stems of other manufacturers were comparable and made up 87.9 and 86.2%, respectively. Achieved data enabled to make conclusion that Wagner SL Revision Stem use is reasonable for patients with hip implant instability in I-IIIA femoral bone deficit, as they are cheaper than the modular revision stems and their design prevents the wear in the area of modular junction.
About the authors
G. M Kavalerskiy
First Moscow state medical university named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia
V. Yu Murylyov
First Moscow state medical university named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia
Ya. A Rukin
First Moscow state medical university named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia
Email: yarbarmaley@gmail.com
M. Yu Kholodaev
City clinical hospital named after S.P. Botkin, Moscow, Russia
P. M Elizarov
First Moscow state medical university named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russia
References
- Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009; 91: 128-33.
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007; 89: 780-5.
- Мурылев В.Ю. Ревизионная артропластика тазобедренного сустава при асептическом расшатывании эндопротеза: Дис.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2009.
- Кавалерский Г.М., Силин Л.Л. Мурылев В.Ю., Кузин В.В., Рукин Я.А., Терентьев Д.И. Импакционная костная пластика вертлужной впадины при тотальном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2008; 1: 66-70.
- Roberson J.R. Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 1992; 23: 291 - 302.
- Рукин Я.А. Ревизионное эндопротезирование вертлужного компонента тотального эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава при его асептической нестабильности: Дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2011.
- Hartman C.W, Garvin K.L. Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93 (24): 2310-22.
- Khanuja H.S., Vakil J.J., Goddard M.S. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93 (5): 500-9.
- Bohm P., Bischel V. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4,8 years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2001; 83 (7): 1023-31
Supplementary files
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).