The anticipatory concept of neurosis and cognitive behavioral model: prospects for integration

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article deals with the theoretical intersections of V.D. Mendelevich’s anticipatory concept of neurosis and models developed within the framework of the cognitive behavioral direction of psychotherapy. The fundamental similarity of approaches is shown, which allows integrating both theoretical and practical aspects of these concepts. Using examples of clinical cases, the possibility of joint integrative conceptualization is demonstrated, taking into account the ideas inherent in both approaches. This work can serve as a basis for further research on the development of psychocorrective and psychotherapeutic interventions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexander S. Granitsa

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: hebechblu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0498-7397
SPIN-code: 4775-7844

M.D., Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof., Depart. of Neurology with Courses in Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Genetics, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology

Russian Federation, Kazan

References

  1. Dobson D, Dobson K. Nauchno-obosnovannaya praktika v kognitivno-povedencheskoj terapii. SPb.: Piter; 2021. 400 р. (In Russ.)
  2. Sun A, Zhu C. Dysfunctional metacognition across psychopathologies: A meta-analytic review. European Psychiatry. 2017;(45):139–153.
  3. Wells A, Purdon CL. Metacognition and cognitive-behaviour therapy: a special issue. Clin Psychol Psychother. 1999;(6): 71–72.
  4. Mendelevich VD, Solov’eva SL. Nevrozologiya i psihosomaticheskaya medicina. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2002. 607 р. (In Russ.)
  5. Ahmetzyanova AI. Anticipacionnaya nesostoyatel’nost’ v usloviyah bolezni i anomal’nogo razvitiya (nauchnaya poziciya Kazanskoj shkoly). Prakticheskaya medicina. 2015;5(90):42‒45. (In Russ.)
  6. Mendelevich VD. Anticipacionnye mekhanizmy nevrozogeneza. M.: Gorodec; 2018. 448 с.
  7. Kazansky A. Agential anticipation in the central nervous system. Cognitive Systems Monographs. 2015;2:101–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19446-2_6.
  8. Nichiporenko NP, Mendelevich VD. Fenomen anticipacionnyh sposobnostej kak predmet psihologicheskogo issledovaniya. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2006;27(5):50–59. (In Russ.)
  9. Hafizova GD, Mendelevich VD. Vzaimosvyaz’ anticipacionnoj sostoyatel’nosti i volevoj deyatel’nosti u pacientov s lichnostnymi rasstrojstvami. PM. 2007;(22):52–54. (In Russ.)
  10. Sumina NE. Klinicheskij podhod k izucheniyu anticipacionnoj sostoyatel’nosti. Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2007;4:22–29. (In Russ.)
  11. Granitsa AS. Vzaimosvyazi intuitivnosti s anticipacionnoj sostoyatel’nost’yu i psihologicheskimi zashchitami u bol’nyh s nevroticheskimi rasstrojstvami. Nevrologicheskij vestnik im. V.M. Bekhtereva. Kazan’. 2017;49(2):20‒24. (In Russ.)
  12. Abitov IR. Anticipacionnaya sostoyatel’nost’ v strukture sovladayushchego povedeniya (v norme i pri psihosomaticheskih i nevroticheskih rasstrojstvah). [Dissertation.] Kazan’; 2007. 158 р. (In Russ.)
  13. Timutsa DR. Sravnitel’nye osobennosti anticipacionnoj sostoyatel’nosti i sposobnosti k prognozirovaniyu u bol’nyh nevroticheskimi i somatoformnymi rasstrojstvami // Prakticheskaya medicina. 2019;17(3):79–83. (In Russ.)
  14. Mihael’skij AV. Psihologiya konstruirovaniya budushchego. M.: MGPPU; 2014. 290 р. (In Russ.)
  15. Falikman MV. Princip predskazyvayushchego kodirovaniya v sovremennyh kognitivnyh issledovaniyah. Voprosy psihologii. 2021;67(3):3–23. (In Russ.)
  16. Falikman MV. Princip predskazyvayushchego kodirovaniya i problema aktivnosti v sovremennoj kognitivnoj nauke. Cognitive Neuroscience. 2020. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo foruma, 11–12 dekabrya 2020 g., Ekaterinburg. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2021. р. 3–7. (In Russ.)
  17. Barrett LF, Simmons WK. Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(7):419–429.
  18. Clark JE, Watson S, Friston KJ. What is mood? A computational perspective. Psychol Med. 2018;48(14):2277–2284.
  19. Fletcher P, Frith C. Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 2009;10:48–58. doi: 10.1038/nrn2536.
  20. Mendelevich VD. Anticipacionnyj trening v kompleksnoj psihoterapii i profilaktike recidivov nevroticheskih rasstrojstv. Rossijskij psihoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 2014;1(7):57−59. (In Russ.)
  21. Prashko YA, Mozhny P., Shpelecki M. et al. Kognitivno-bihevioral’naya terapiya psihicheskih rasstrojstv. M.: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij; 2016. 1000 р. (In Russ.)
  22. Bek Dzh. Kognitivno-povedencheskaya terapiya: ot osnov k napravleniyam. SPb.: Piter; 2018. 416 р. (In Russ.)
  23. Uolen S, Di Gusepp R, Uessler R. Racional’no-emotivnaya psihoterapiya: kognitivno-bihevioral’nyj podhod. Per. s angl. obshch. red. M.: Institut Gumanitarnyh Znanij; 1997. 257 р. (In Russ.)
  24. Zaharova ML. Issledovanie disfunkcional’nyh otnoshenij u bol’nyh nevrozami i ih dinamiki v processe psihoterapii. [Dissertation]. SPb., 2001. 230 р. (In Russ.)
  25. Zaharova ML. “Shkala disfunkcional’nyh otnoshenij” kak metod issledovaniya kognitivnyh iskazhenij. Lichnost’, sem’ya i obshchestvo: voprosy pedagogiki i psihologii. Sbornik statej po materialam XXXV mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Novosibirsk: SibAK, 2013. р. 68–76. (In Russ.)
  26. Burno AM. “Pustoe usilie” kak yavlenie zdorovoj i bol’noj dushevnoj zhizni // Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2012;6(17). http://medpsy.ru (access data: 19.06.2022). (In Russ.)
  27. Burno AM. Terapiya pustogo usiliya. Kognitivno-orientirovannyj podhod k bystromu oblegcheniyu dushevnoj boli. M.: Rossijskij universitet druzhby narodov, 2015. 340 р. (In Russ.)
  28. Bek AT. 60-letnyaya evolyuciya kognitivnoj teorii i terapii (perevod D.V. Kovpak, A.I. Murtazin). VIII Mezhdunarodnyj forum Associacii kognitivno-povedencheskoj psihoterapii CBTFORUM: Sb. n. st. SPb.: Lema, 2022; р. 7–17. (In Russ.)
  29. Sirota NA, Moskovchenko DV, Yaltonskij VM, Yaltonskaya AV. Aprobaciya kratkoj versii oprosnika metakognitivnyh ubezhdenij na russkoyazychnoj vyborke. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 2018;15(2):307–325. (In Russ.)
  30. Wells A, Matthews G. Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34(11–12):881–888.
  31. Wells A, Papageorgiou C. Relationships between worry, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behav Res Ther. 1998;(36):899–913.
  32. Lihi R. Tekhniki kognitivnoj psihoterapii. SPB.: Piter; 2020. 656 р. (In Russ.)
  33. Holmogorova AB. Kognitivno-bihevioral’nye modeli i metody lecheniya generalizovannogo trevozhnogo rasstrojstva. Sovremennaya terapiya psihicheskih rasstrojstv. 2014(3):19–34. (In Russ.)
  34. Roberge P, Provencher MD, Gosselin P et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of group transdiagnostic cognitive-behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in primary care: study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):320.
  35. Prasko J, Kamaradova D, Cakirpaloglu S. et al. Predicting the therapeutic response to intensive psychotherapeutic programs in patients with neurotic spectrum disorders. Act Nerv Super Rediviva. 2015; 57(1–2):1191–1201.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 75562 от 12 апреля 2019 года.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies