Selection of retroperitoneal access during intervertebral disc endoprosthesis in lumbar spine

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The morphometric parameters and surgical areas of risk of retroperitoneal approach were studied for endoprosthetics of intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine to reduce trauma and reduce the risk of complications. The study included 110 patients operated on in the period from 2017 to 2020 (72 men, 38 women) in the neurosurgical department of the 1586 Military Clinical Hospital. The average age of the patients was 44.9 ± 15.4 years. According to the localization of access to the lumbar spine, the patients were distributed as follows: LIII–LIV — 8 (7.3%), LIV–LV — 46 (41.7%), LV–SI — 56 (51%). It was found that, for the intervertebral disc LV – SI, the length of the skin incision was 92.5 (80; 100) mm, the length of the surgical wound was 80 (80; 110) mm, the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer was 30 (15; 40) mm, the depth of the wound was to the spine — 85 (70; 120) mm, the depth of the wound to the spinal canal — 125 (107.5; 152.5) mm, the angle of operation in the horizontal plane at the level of the spine — 52 (47; 59.5) degrees. On the basis of the anthropometric data of patients, the optimal length of the skin incision was determined for performing the retroperitoneal approach (120 mm for level LIII–LIV, 100 mm — for level LIV–LV). Three variants of the inferior vena cava bifurcation have been identified for different levels of intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine: high bifurcation, left common iliac vein mainly overlaps the left half of the LIV–LV intervertebral disc and does not overlap the LV–SI intervertebral disc; middle bifurcation, left common iliac vein overlaps the central part of the intervertebral discs LIV–LV and LV–SI; low bifurcation, inferior vena cava overlaps the right side of the intervertebral disc LIV–LV, inferior vena cava and left common iliac vein completely overlap the intervertebral disc LV–SI. The data obtained can be used when planning retroperitoneal access to the lumbar spine in order to reduce the trauma of the operation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maxim A. Priymak

1586th Military Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: Priymak@yandex.ru

Chief resident

Russian Federation, Podolsk

Ivan A. Kruglov

1586th Military Clinical Hospital

Email: Priymak@yandex.ru

Head of the neurosurgical department

Russian Federation, Podolsk

Alexei I. Gaivoronski

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov; Saint Petersburg State University

Email: Priymak@yandex.ru

Doctor of medical sciences professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Maksim N. Kravtsov

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov

Email: Priymak@yandex.ru

Doctor of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Gennady G. Bulyshchenko

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov

Email: Priymak@yandex.ru

Candidate of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Mitbreit IМ, Glazyrin DI. Anterior spinal fusion V.D. Chaklina. Spinal Surgery. 2017;14(1):91–99. (In Russ).
  2. Nalbandian MM, Hoashi JS, Errico TJ. Variations in the iliolumbar vein during the anterior approach for spinal procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(8):E445–E450. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828972ac.
  3. Busardò FP, Frati P, Carbone I, et al. Iatrogenic left common iliac artery and vein perforation during lumbar discectomy: a fatal case. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;246:e7–e11. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.006.
  4. Lazennec JY, Pouzet B, Ramare S, et al. Anatomic basis of minimal anterior extraperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21(1):7–15. doi: 10.1007/BF01635046.
  5. Lucas F, Emery E, Dudoit T, Berger L. Influence of Obesity on Access-Related Complications During Anterior Lumbar Spine Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2016;92:229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.104.
  6. Кim HD, Vaccaro АR, Dickman КА, editors. The Spine. Surgical Anatomy and Technique. Мoscow: Panfilov Publishing House; 2016. (In Russ.)
  7. Smoljanovic T, Bicanic G, Bojanic I. Re: Kleeman TJ, Ahn UM, Talbot-Kleeman A. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2: a prospective study of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine 2001;26:2751–6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(20):E1013. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181edf48a
  8. Efimov AN. Topographo-anatomicheskie aspekti sravnitelnoy otsenki operativnih dostupov k pozvonochniku [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2011. (In Russ.)
  9. Molloy S, Butler JS, Benton A, et al. A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2016;16(6):786–791. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.044.
  10. Korzh AA, Talyshinsky RR, Khvisyuk NI. Surgical approaches to the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae (anatomical and surgical justification). Moscow: Medicine; 1968. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1.Measurement of the angle of operative activity and angle of inclination of the operating action axis in segment LIII — LIV (diagram): 1 — contents of the peritoneal cavity; 2 — aorta; 3 — inferior vena cava; 4 — sympathetic trunk

Download (684KB)
3. Fig. 2.The location of the IVC bifurcation in relation to the intervertebral discs: a — high bifurcation, the LCIV overlaps mainly the left half of the LIV–LV intervertebral disc and does not overlap the LV–SI intervertebral disc; b — middle bifurcation, LCIV overlaps the central part of the intervertebral discs LIV–LV and LV–SI; c — low bifurcation, IVC overlaps the right side of the intervertebral disc LIV–LV, IVC and LCIV completely overlap the intervertebral disc LV–SI

Download (244KB)
4. Fig. 3.Intraoperative photographs illustrating a variant of high IVC bifurcation relative to the intervertebral disc LV–SI. In both cases, the LV–SI segment is located at the fork between the common iliac veins

Download (208KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Priymak M.A., Kruglov I.A., Gaivoronski A.I., Kravtsov M.N., Bulyshchenko G.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 77762 от 10.02.2020.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies