Historical aspects and current advances in pharmacological therapy for chronic heart failure

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This review presents a synthesis of major Russian and international research findings on chronic heart failure and current principles of its management. Russian, American, and European clinical guidelines on heart failure were analyzed. This study examined and reinterpreted the results of international multicenter randomized trials such as “Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure,” “Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitors with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure,” and “Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure” and statistical data on cardiovascular diseases from the American Heart Association. Based on left ventricular ejection fraction, three main phenotypes of chronic heart failure were distinguished: reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction. American cardiology societies recommend the term heart failure with improved ejection fraction for patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction has increased to >40% during treatment and increased by >10% over time. Differentiation among these phenotypes is crucial owing to differences in comorbidities and treatment response. Overall, treatment approaches for chronic heart failure have changed over time; however, in the past few decades, they have undergone dramatic transformations. In the mid-20th century, the only drugs used for treatment were cardiac glycosides and loop diuretics; the modern approach provides for the use of quadruple therapy. Comparative analysis of the international multicenter randomized trials demonstrated significant advantages of combination therapy. Nevertheless, despite clear advances in treatment and prevention, the number of patients with chronic heart failure continues to increase. In the United States, over 6.5 million people suffer from heart failure, whereas in the Russian Federation, the prevalence of chronic heart failure increased from 6.7% in 2002 to 8.2% in 2017. Moreover, mortality from heart failure among the population remains high. In the United States, the 5-year mortality after diagnosis is approximately 50%, and in the Russian Federation, an average of 414,000 people with functional class III–IV chronic heart failure die each year. These indicate the need to continue searching for new therapeutic approaches and drug targets.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexey N. Kuchmin

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7074-8747
SPIN-code: 7787-1364

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Alexandra A. Chernyakhovskay

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-8007-5797
SPIN-code: 1696-3661

lecturer

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Anna V. Tanich

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3349-1813
SPIN-code: 4059-6128

lecturer

Russian Federation, 6Zh Akademika Lebedeva st., Saint Petersburg, 194044

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485 EDN: NBLKNT
  2. Polyakov DS, Fomin IV, Belenkov YN, et al. Chronic heart failure in the Russian Federation: what has changed over 20 years of follow-up? Results of the EPOCH-CHF study. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(4):4–14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.4.n1628 EDN: WSZNFS
  3. Lawson CA, Zaccardi F, Squire I, et al. Risk factors for heart failure: 20-year population-based trends by sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(2):e006472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006472 EDN: YSMXSU
  4. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the cooperative North Scandinavian enalapril survival study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1429–1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162301
  5. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(5):293–302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108013250501
  6. Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, et al. Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group. Circulation. 1999;100(23):2312–2318. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2312
  7. Garg R, Yusuf S. Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 1995;273(18):1450–1456. doi: 10.10001/jama.1995.03520420066040
  8. Sharma D, Buyse M, Pitt B, et al. Meta-analysis of observed mortality data from all controlled, double-blind multiple-dose studies of losartan in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(2):187–192. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00646-3
  9. Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):772–776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14284-5 EDN: GMTHYL
  10. Cohn JN, Tognoni G. Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1667–1675. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010713
  11. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993–1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077 EDN: XQTXEY
  12. Packer M, Califf RM, Konstam MA, et al. Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the omapatrilat versus enalapril randomized trial of utility in reducing events (OVERTURE). Circulation. 2002;106(8):920–926. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000029801.86489.50
  13. Galyavich AS, Tereshchenko SN, Uskach TM, et al. 2024 clinical practice guidelines for chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(11):6162. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6162 EDN: WKIDLJ
  14. Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, et al. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the carvedilol or metoprolol European trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9377):7–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7 EDN: GMUFKV
  15. MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL randomised intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2001–2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04440-2
  16. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. carvedilol heart failure study group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(21):1349–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342101
  17. Fowler MB. Carvedilol prospective randomized cumulative survival (COPERNICUS) trial: carvedilol in severe heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(9A):35B–39B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.004
  18. CIBIS-II Investigators. The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study II (CIBIS-II): A randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9146):9–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11181-9 EDN: CZAYGH
  19. Flather MD, Shibata MC, Coats AJ, et al. Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS). Eur Heart J. 2005;26(3):215–225. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi115 EDN: XJQBXR
  20. Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC). Chronic heart failure. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083
  21. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709–717. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001
  22. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309–1321. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030207 EDN: GNHTJF
  23. Cowie MR, Fisher M. SGLT2 inhibitors: mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit beyond glycaemic control. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(12):761–772. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8 EDN: VWAFPO
  24. Lytvyn Y, Skrtic M, Yang GK, et al. Glycosuria-mediated urinary uric acid excretion in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308(2):77–83. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00555.2014
  25. Terasaki M, Hiromura M, Mori Y, et al. Amelioration of hyperglycemia with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor prevents macrophage-driven atherosclerosis through macrophage foam cell formation suppression in type 1 and type 2 diabetic mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143396
  26. Verma S, Garg A, Yan AT, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in individuals with diabetes: an important clue to the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial? Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):212–213. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1312
  27. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 EDN: FGPNUX
  28. Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):819–829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9 EDN: NFDVNP
  29. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1451–1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 EDN: MKKUVV
  30. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, et al. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(12):1089–1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286 EDN: AWLZRU
  31. Faris R, Flather M, Purcell H, et al. Current evidence supporting the role of diuretics in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2002;82(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(01)00600-3 EDN: ATXTRV
  32. Paul S. Balancing diuretic therapy in heart failure: loop diuretics, thiazides, and aldosterone antagonists. Congest Heart Fail. 2002;8(6):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2002.00700.x
  33. Jentzer JC, DeWald TA, Hernandez AF. Combination of loop diuretics with thiazide-type diuretics in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(19):1527–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.034
  34. Cosin J, Diez J; TORIC investigators. Torasemide in chronic heart failure: results of the TORIC study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(4):507–513. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00122-8
  35. Müller K. Torasemide vs. furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV — efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(6):793–801. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00150-8
  36. Täger T, Fröhlich H, Seiz M, et al. READY: relative efficacy of loop diuretics in patients with chronic systolic heart failure-a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart Fail Rev. 2019;24(4):461–472. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09771-8 EDN: PZKDNN
  37. Mentz RJ, Anstrom KJ, Eisenstein EL, et al. Effect of torsemide vs furosemide after discharge on all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure: the transform-HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329(3):214–223. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23924 EDN: NLZEBR
  38. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(1):117–224. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5168 EDN: SJMIKK
  39. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875–885. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61198-1 EDN: YZNALJ
  40. Böhm M, Borer J, Ford I, et al. Heart rate at baseline influences the effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure: analysis from the SHIFT study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(1):11–22. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0467-8 EDN: TYNXAG
  41. The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(8):525–533. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702203360801
  42. Whitbeck MG, Charnigo RJ, Khairy P, et al. Increased mortality among patients taking digoxin - analysis from the AFFIRM study. Eur Heart J. 2012;34(20):1481–1488. doi: 10.1093/euheartj/ehs348
  43. Villevalde SV, Soloveva AE. Decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: overcoming barriers to improve prognosis in the “vulnerable” period after discharge. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(12):82–93. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.12.n1860 EDN: MUTYWE
  44. Armstrong PW, Pieske B, Anstrom KJ, et al. Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1883–1893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915928 EDN: QCFGFM
  45. Cohn JN, Archibald DG, Ziesche S, et al. Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(24):1547–1552. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606123142404
  46. McNamara DM, Tam SW, Sabolinski ML, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (nos3) polymorphisms in African Americans with heart failure: results from the A-HeFT trial. J Card Fail. 2009;15(3):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.10.028
  47. Taylor AL. The African American heart failure trial: A clinical trial update. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(7):44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.033

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 77762 от 10.02.2020.