Historical aspects and current advances in pharmacological therapy for chronic heart failure
- Authors: Kuchmin A.N.1, Chernyakhovskay A.A.1, Tanich A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Issue: Vol 27, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 429-440
- Section: Review
- Submitted: 30.10.2024
- Accepted: 02.06.2025
- Published: 20.09.2025
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1682-7392/article/view/640805
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/brmma640805
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VKWCJR
- ID: 640805
Cite item
Abstract
This review presents a synthesis of major Russian and international research findings on chronic heart failure and current principles of its management. Russian, American, and European clinical guidelines on heart failure were analyzed. This study examined and reinterpreted the results of international multicenter randomized trials such as “Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure,” “Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitors with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure,” and “Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure” and statistical data on cardiovascular diseases from the American Heart Association. Based on left ventricular ejection fraction, three main phenotypes of chronic heart failure were distinguished: reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction. American cardiology societies recommend the term heart failure with improved ejection fraction for patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction has increased to >40% during treatment and increased by >10% over time. Differentiation among these phenotypes is crucial owing to differences in comorbidities and treatment response. Overall, treatment approaches for chronic heart failure have changed over time; however, in the past few decades, they have undergone dramatic transformations. In the mid-20th century, the only drugs used for treatment were cardiac glycosides and loop diuretics; the modern approach provides for the use of quadruple therapy. Comparative analysis of the international multicenter randomized trials demonstrated significant advantages of combination therapy. Nevertheless, despite clear advances in treatment and prevention, the number of patients with chronic heart failure continues to increase. In the United States, over 6.5 million people suffer from heart failure, whereas in the Russian Federation, the prevalence of chronic heart failure increased from 6.7% in 2002 to 8.2% in 2017. Moreover, mortality from heart failure among the population remains high. In the United States, the 5-year mortality after diagnosis is approximately 50%, and in the Russian Federation, an average of 414,000 people with functional class III–IV chronic heart failure die each year. These indicate the need to continue searching for new therapeutic approaches and drug targets.
Full Text

About the authors
Alexey N. Kuchmin
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7074-8747
SPIN-code: 7787-1364
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, St. PetersburgAlexandra A. Chernyakhovskay
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-8007-5797
SPIN-code: 1696-3661
lecturer
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAnna V. Tanich
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: vmeda-nio@mil.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3349-1813
SPIN-code: 4059-6128
lecturer
Russian Federation, 6Zh Akademika Lebedeva st., Saint Petersburg, 194044References
- Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485 EDN: NBLKNT
- Polyakov DS, Fomin IV, Belenkov YN, et al. Chronic heart failure in the Russian Federation: what has changed over 20 years of follow-up? Results of the EPOCH-CHF study. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(4):4–14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.4.n1628 EDN: WSZNFS
- Lawson CA, Zaccardi F, Squire I, et al. Risk factors for heart failure: 20-year population-based trends by sex, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(2):e006472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006472 EDN: YSMXSU
- CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the cooperative North Scandinavian enalapril survival study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1429–1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162301
- The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(5):293–302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108013250501
- Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, et al. Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. ATLAS Study Group. Circulation. 1999;100(23):2312–2318. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2312
- Garg R, Yusuf S. Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 1995;273(18):1450–1456. doi: 10.10001/jama.1995.03520420066040
- Sharma D, Buyse M, Pitt B, et al. Meta-analysis of observed mortality data from all controlled, double-blind multiple-dose studies of losartan in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(2):187–192. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00646-3
- Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):772–776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14284-5 EDN: GMTHYL
- Cohn JN, Tognoni G. Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1667–1675. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010713
- McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993–1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077 EDN: XQTXEY
- Packer M, Califf RM, Konstam MA, et al. Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the omapatrilat versus enalapril randomized trial of utility in reducing events (OVERTURE). Circulation. 2002;106(8):920–926. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000029801.86489.50
- Galyavich AS, Tereshchenko SN, Uskach TM, et al. 2024 clinical practice guidelines for chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(11):6162. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6162 EDN: WKIDLJ
- Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, et al. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the carvedilol or metoprolol European trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9377):7–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7 EDN: GMUFKV
- MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL randomised intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2001–2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04440-2
- Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. carvedilol heart failure study group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(21):1349–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342101
- Fowler MB. Carvedilol prospective randomized cumulative survival (COPERNICUS) trial: carvedilol in severe heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(9A):35B–39B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.004
- CIBIS-II Investigators. The cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study II (CIBIS-II): A randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9146):9–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11181-9 EDN: CZAYGH
- Flather MD, Shibata MC, Coats AJ, et al. Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS). Eur Heart J. 2005;26(3):215–225. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi115 EDN: XJQBXR
- Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC). Chronic heart failure. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083
- Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709–717. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001
- Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309–1321. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030207 EDN: GNHTJF
- Cowie MR, Fisher M. SGLT2 inhibitors: mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit beyond glycaemic control. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(12):761–772. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8 EDN: VWAFPO
- Lytvyn Y, Skrtic M, Yang GK, et al. Glycosuria-mediated urinary uric acid excretion in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308(2):77–83. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00555.2014
- Terasaki M, Hiromura M, Mori Y, et al. Amelioration of hyperglycemia with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor prevents macrophage-driven atherosclerosis through macrophage foam cell formation suppression in type 1 and type 2 diabetic mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143396
- Verma S, Garg A, Yan AT, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in individuals with diabetes: an important clue to the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial? Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):212–213. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1312
- Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 EDN: FGPNUX
- Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):819–829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9 EDN: NFDVNP
- Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1451–1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 EDN: MKKUVV
- Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, et al. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(12):1089–1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286 EDN: AWLZRU
- Faris R, Flather M, Purcell H, et al. Current evidence supporting the role of diuretics in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2002;82(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(01)00600-3 EDN: ATXTRV
- Paul S. Balancing diuretic therapy in heart failure: loop diuretics, thiazides, and aldosterone antagonists. Congest Heart Fail. 2002;8(6):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2002.00700.x
- Jentzer JC, DeWald TA, Hernandez AF. Combination of loop diuretics with thiazide-type diuretics in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(19):1527–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.034
- Cosin J, Diez J; TORIC investigators. Torasemide in chronic heart failure: results of the TORIC study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4(4):507–513. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00122-8
- Müller K. Torasemide vs. furosemide in primary care patients with chronic heart failure NYHA II to IV — efficacy and quality of life. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5(6):793–801. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00150-8
- Täger T, Fröhlich H, Seiz M, et al. READY: relative efficacy of loop diuretics in patients with chronic systolic heart failure-a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart Fail Rev. 2019;24(4):461–472. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09771-8 EDN: PZKDNN
- Mentz RJ, Anstrom KJ, Eisenstein EL, et al. Effect of torsemide vs furosemide after discharge on all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure: the transform-HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329(3):214–223. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23924 EDN: NLZEBR
- ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(1):117–224. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5168 EDN: SJMIKK
- Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875–885. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61198-1 EDN: YZNALJ
- Böhm M, Borer J, Ford I, et al. Heart rate at baseline influences the effect of ivabradine on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure: analysis from the SHIFT study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(1):11–22. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0467-8 EDN: TYNXAG
- The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(8):525–533. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702203360801
- Whitbeck MG, Charnigo RJ, Khairy P, et al. Increased mortality among patients taking digoxin - analysis from the AFFIRM study. Eur Heart J. 2012;34(20):1481–1488. doi: 10.1093/euheartj/ehs348
- Villevalde SV, Soloveva AE. Decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: overcoming barriers to improve prognosis in the “vulnerable” period after discharge. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(12):82–93. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.12.n1860 EDN: MUTYWE
- Armstrong PW, Pieske B, Anstrom KJ, et al. Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1883–1893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915928 EDN: QCFGFM
- Cohn JN, Archibald DG, Ziesche S, et al. Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(24):1547–1552. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606123142404
- McNamara DM, Tam SW, Sabolinski ML, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (nos3) polymorphisms in African Americans with heart failure: results from the A-HeFT trial. J Card Fail. 2009;15(3):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.10.028
- Taylor AL. The African American heart failure trial: A clinical trial update. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(7):44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.033
Supplementary files
