Choice of treatment method of obstructive jaundice in patients with tumors of the hepatopancreatobiliary region

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The leading criteria for choosing minimally invasive surgical treatment of mechanical jaundice of tumor origin in the hepatopancreatobiliary zone are substantiated, which increase the effectiveness of surgical intervention and reduce the number of complications and mortality. The examination and surgical treatment results of 325 patients with mechanical jaundice of tumor origin, who underwent minimally invasive decompression of the biliary tract after clinical and laboratory diagnostics following national clinical recommendations, were analyzed. Based on the treatment results, the leading criteria that affect the selection of the method of minimally invasive drainage surgery are identified. The main criteria influencing the choice of minimally invasive intervention to decompress the bile ducts were as follows: level of bile duct block, severity of mechanical jaundice (according to the classification of E.I. Galperin), and the operability of the patient. Endoscopic stenting was the method of choice in inoperable cases at the level of block I with mechanical jaundice of classes A and B. Moreover, endoscopic stenting was the most successful intervention with a minimum number of complications in people with block II level. The indication for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was a level III biliary tract block, as well as the ineffectiveness of endoscopic stenting. Cholecystostomy is the safest and most effective in patients with block level I with class C mechanical jaundice and in operable cases with the same block level. In general, results of surgical interventions aimed at eliminating mechanical jaundice of tumor origin, conducted using modern examination methods of patients and taking into account the assessment of criteria such as the block level of the bile ducts, severity of mechanical jaundice, and general condition allow us to justify the choice of the most successful and safe option for its elimination.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Pavel N. Romashchenko

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: romashchenko@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8918-1730
SPIN-code: 3850-1792

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nicolay A. Maistrenko

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: nik.m.47@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1405-7660
SPIN-code: 2571-9603

doctor of medical sciences, professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey I. Kuznetsov

Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: k9522765910@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6646-783X
SPIN-code: 2905-6368

surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrey S. Pryadko

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation; Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: pradko66@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7848-6704
SPIN-code: 2684-3990

doctor of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Arsen K. Aliev

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: arsik-0587@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5923-8804
SPIN-code: 1259-3231

candidate of medical sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The Epidemiology of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1252–1261. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068
  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics. Ca Cancer. 2017;63(1):11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166
  3. Glazer ES, Hornbrook MC, Krouse RS. A meta-analysis of randomized trials: immediate stent placement vs. surgical bypass in the palliative management of malignant biliary obstruction. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(2):307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.013
  4. Cvirkun VV, Buriev IM, Glabaj VP, et al. Resolution of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association of Commonwealth of Independent States Executive Board Plenary Session. Minimally invasive technologies for obstructive jaundice, 29–30 April 2019, Erevan, Armenia Available from: https://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=spz:neicon:hepato:y:2019:i:2:p:124-127 (In Russ.).
  5. Vishnevskij VA. Mekhanicheskaya zheltuha. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. 2018. Internet portal Rossijskogo obshchestva hirurgov. (In Russ.). Available from: http://xn----9sbdbejx7bdduahou3a5d.xn--p1ai/stranica-pravlenija/klinicheskie-rekomendaci/urgentnaja-abdominalnaja-hirurgija/klinicheskie-rekomendaci-mehanicheskaja-zheltuha.html
  6. Romashchenko PN, Majstrenko NA, Kuznecov AI, et al. Malignant obstructive jaundice: justification of the method of biliary decompression. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2020;25(2):124–136. (In Russ.) doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.20202124-136
  7. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice 20 Edition. 2017;1001–1095.
  8. Bykov MI. Puti uluchsheniya rezul’tatov endoskopicheskih chrespapillyarnyh vmeshatel’stvu bol’nyh s distal’noj obstrukciej zhelchevyvodyashchih protokov: [dissertation] Krasnodar; 2015. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01006645392 (In Russ.).
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  10. William D, Owens MD. American Society of anesthesiologists physical status classification system is not a risk classification system. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(2):378. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200102000-00042
  11. Gal’perin EI, Momunova ON. The classification of obstructive jaundice severity. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014. Vol. 1. P. 5–9. (In Russ.).
  12. Burdyukov MS, Nechipaj AM, Yurichev IN. Ocenka tyazhesti sostoyaniya bol’nyh, obuslovlennoj mekhanicheskoj zheltuhoj opuholevoj prirody, v prognoze razvitiya oslozhnenij ERHPG i endoskopicheskoj retrogradnoj biliarnoj dekompressii. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology Journal. 2010;4:78–85. (In Russ.).
  13. Moole H. Efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016;14(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0933-2
  14. . Admassie D, Yesus A, Denke A. Validity of ultrasonography in diagnosing obstructive jaundice. East Afr Med J. 2005;82(7):379–381.
  15. Katabathina V, Dasyam A, Dasyam N, Hosseinzadeh K. Adult bile duct strictures: role of MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in characterization. Radiographics. 2014;34(3):565–586. doi: 10.1148/rg.343125211
  16. Budzinskij SA, Shapoval’yanc SG, Fedorov ED, et al. Sovremennye vozmozhnosti endoskopicheskogo retrogradnogo protezirovaniya zhelchnyh protokov v razreshenii mekhanicheskoj zheltuhi pri zlokachestvennyh opuholyah pankreatobiliarnoj zony. Rossijskij zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii. 2014;24(5):11–21. (In Russ.).
  17. Matsumoto K, Takeda Y, Onoyama T, et al. Endoscopic treatment for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(8):190. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.22
  18. Korolev MP, Fedotov LE, Avanesyan RG, Lepekhin GM. Bilobar stenting for tumors of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Malignant tumours. 2015;2:46–52. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2015-2-46-52
  19. Fathy O. Surgical management of periampullary tumors: a retrospective study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55(85): 1463–1469.
  20. Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9(9):CD005444. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005444.pub3
  21. Romashchenko PN, Fekliunin AA, Maistrenko NA, et al. Transpapillary endoscopic surgery: predictors of complications and prevention of their development. Endoscopic Surgery. Endoscopic Surgery. 2021;27(1):40–48 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/endoskop20212701140

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Romashchenko P.N., Maistrenko N.A., Kuznetsov A.I., Pryadko A.S., Aliev A.K.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 77762 от 10.02.2020.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies