Endovideogernioplasty in patients with inguinal hernias: advantages and disadvantages

This study analyzed the results of treatment of patients with inguinal hernias, with an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of endovideosurgical hernioplasty techniques. The clinical study used the data of 1317 patients with inguinal hernias. The results revealed that the totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair had some advantages over laparoscopic hernioplasty, such as a shorter duration of surgery (43 ± 15 min), mild pain on a visual analog scale, and an average bed-day after surgery. Complications were diagnosed in 16 (1.2%) patients, and most had Clavien–Dindo grade II complications. Relapses were detected in 7 (0.5%) cases. Thus, endoscopic hernioplasty (laparoscopic and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty) was the preferred surgery for patients with bilateral inguinal hernia, recurrent hernia after traditional hernioplasty, and metabolic syndrome and young people of working age. The use of a modified technique of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with a clear understanding of the multifascial structure of the anterior abdominal wall may reduce the risks of both intraoperative and postoperative complications and increase the cost-effectiveness of treatment of patients with inguinal hernias, allowing us to obtain good results.