CONTENT OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE COURT, WHEN APPLYING THE SPECIAL ORDER REVISED BY CHAPTER 40 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: PROOF OR QUASI-PROOF?
- Authors: Turilov G.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban state University
- Issue: Vol 12, No 7 (2019)
- Pages: 126-128
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/530580
- ID: 530580
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
This article examines very important and complex questions about the nature of the court’s activities in criminal cases in accordance with Chapter 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. To this end, scientific views on the problem under study were studied, legislation was analyzed, including foreign, and, of course, practice. Based on these elements, the author’s conclusion is formulated and proposals are made to amend the legislation in order to eliminate ambiguity in this matter.
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
Georgy Georgievich Turilov
Kuban state University
Email: turilov.george@mail.ru
PhD at Law, Associate professor. Position: Associate Professor. Department: criminal process chair.
References
- Боярская А.В. Характер и последствия преобразования предмета доказывания в рамках особого порядка судебного разбирательства // Вестник Омского университета. - Серия «Право». - 2010. - № 3 (24).- С. 203-208.
- Блинова О.Г. Возможно ли вынесение правосудного приговора при особом порядке принятия судебного решения? // Судебная власть и уголовный процесс. - 2019. №1. - С.57-60.
- Приговор по делу Евсеева В.А. обвиняемого в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч.2 ст. 318 УК РФ № 1-134/17 от 18 мая 2017 года по делу № 1-134/17 // Архив Динского районного суда Краснодарского края. 2017.
- Udges handbook for criminal cases // https:// zimlii.org/content/judges-handbook-criminal-cases.
Supplementary files
