On the classification of forensic examinations as criminalistic
- Authors: Kuchmezov R.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
- Issue: Vol 13, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 265-268
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2072-3164/article/view/530953
- ID: 530953
Cite item
Abstract
In modern science and forensics, classification of forensic examinations deserves special consideration. The basis for the correct classification is the most essential strictly scientific and objective feature specified in the work by N.A. Selivanov [1, p. 52]. Today, when studying the section of forensic science "forensic techniques", knowledge and methods of forensic examination are considered simultaneously with the questions of detection, fixation and subsequent seizure of traces, their further role in the detection and investigation of crimes. Recently, the integration of scientific knowledge in all areas of expert activity has been clearly traced, as evidenced by scientific work in the field of complexity and integration of expert research. Against this background, the process of formation of new classes, births and kinds has been actively continued. The article considers the complexity of the fact that the investigative and judicial practice requires experts to solve equally important non-identification issues. Such issues include determination of the event mechanism, determination of the method and time characteristics, determination of quantitative criteria of objects, presence of changes in time intervals of the event, etc.
Keywords
Full Text
![Restricted Access](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
About the authors
Rasul Abdulmutalifovich Kuchmezov
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Email: kuchmez@mail.ru
senior lecturer of the Fire Training Department Nalchik, Russia
References
- Селиванов Н.А. и др. Советская криминалистика. Теоретические проблемы. М.: 1978, с. 52.
- Карданов, Р.Р. Тенденции развития возможностей идентификационных судебно-баллистических экспертиз / Р.Р. Карданов // Доклады Адыгской (Черкесской) Международной академии наук. 2015. Т. 17. № 1.
- Кучмезов, Р.А. К вопросу о понятии «вещественные доказательства» в уголовном судопроизводстве / Р.А. Кучмезов // Успехи современной науки. 2017. Т. 6. № 4.
- Кондаков Н.И. Логический словарь. М., 1971.
- Россинская Е.Р. Современные проблемы использования специальных познаний в судопроизводстве // Судебная экспертиза: теоретические, практические, дидактические вопросы: Сборн. науч. тр. М., 2002.
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)