On the classification of forensic examinations as criminalistic


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

In modern science and forensics, classification of forensic examinations deserves special consideration. The basis for the correct classification is the most essential strictly scientific and objective feature specified in the work by N.A. Selivanov [1, p. 52]. Today, when studying the section of forensic science "forensic techniques", knowledge and methods of forensic examination are considered simultaneously with the questions of detection, fixation and subsequent seizure of traces, their further role in the detection and investigation of crimes. Recently, the integration of scientific knowledge in all areas of expert activity has been clearly traced, as evidenced by scientific work in the field of complexity and integration of expert research. Against this background, the process of formation of new classes, births and kinds has been actively continued. The article considers the complexity of the fact that the investigative and judicial practice requires experts to solve equally important non-identification issues. Such issues include determination of the event mechanism, determination of the method and time characteristics, determination of quantitative criteria of objects, presence of changes in time intervals of the event, etc.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Rasul Kuchmezov

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: kuchmez@mail.ru
senior lecturer of the Fire Training Department Nalchik, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Селиванов Н.А. и др. Советская криминалистика. Теоретические проблемы. М.: 1978, с. 52.
  2. Карданов, Р.Р. Тенденции развития возможностей идентификационных судебно-баллистических экспертиз / Р.Р. Карданов // Доклады Адыгской (Черкесской) Международной академии наук. 2015. Т. 17. № 1.
  3. Кучмезов, Р.А. К вопросу о понятии «вещественные доказательства» в уголовном судопроизводстве / Р.А. Кучмезов // Успехи современной науки. 2017. Т. 6. № 4.
  4. Кондаков Н.И. Логический словарь. М., 1971.
  5. Россинская Е.Р. Современные проблемы использования специальных познаний в судопроизводстве // Судебная экспертиза: теоретические, практические, дидактические вопросы: Сборн. науч. тр. М., 2002.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies