Abstract
Purpose, task: A number of ideological, theoretical and doctrinal reasons prevent the establishment of a correct view of the organization of crime prevention and the place of the Prosecutor's office in this organization. The aim of the work is to optimize the institution of prosecution in the legal organization of crime prevention. The task set by the author is to formulate the existing problem caused by the existing investigative version of such an organization and develop proposals for its optimal solution. Methodology: In the course of the research, both General scientific and private scientific research methods were used: deduction, induction, generalization, forecasting, modeling, comparison, formalization, etc. Conclusions: as a result of the analysis of various points of view that exist in the doctrine of criminal procedure law on the legal organization of combating crime, the author criticizes the investigative version of such an organization and justifies the need to use the Prosecutor's model. The author's position is based on constitutional and legal norms, norms of criminal procedure legislation, as well as the claim theory of the prosecution. It is argued that the basis of the legal organization of crime is the criminal procedure Institute of prosecution. According to the author of the article, the Prosecutor should be positioned as a subject of the public right to a criminal claim (accusation). The judicial mechanism should be set in motion through the introduction of charges in court, the result of which is a verdict or other final procedural decision in a criminal case. The possibility of subsequent use: The results obtained in the course of the study can be used to improve the domestic criminal procedure legislation, continue research in the field of development of the Institute of prosecution in court proceedings, to improve judicial and investigative practice, as well as in the course of the educational process when preparing students in the direction of «Jurisprudence». The practical significance of the results is expressed in the possibility of their use in investigative and judicial activities. Social significance of the results obtained is seen in the optimization of the criminal procedure Institute of prosecution in criminal proceedings.
Open Access
Access granted
