Cybersecurity in the Context of a New Technological Revolution and an Experience of BRICS States


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article considers the influence of disruptive technologies as an impact factor of a modern system of cybersecurity and scientific and technological development (STI-Science, Technology and Innovation) in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution, taking into account the experience of the BRICS countries, as well as the development of mechanisms for international scientific and technical cooperation within the BRICS. The author’s finding of an inevitable development of cooperation within the framework of the BRICS group in order to improve information infrastructure and cybersecurity, ivolve national legal systems and creation of impact factors to create wide prospects for cooperation in the information sphere within the BRICS group and on a global scale. The state of information and cybersecurity will largely depend on the effectiveness of the activities of international organizations, associations of states and regional international structures. At the same time, the level of security in the information sphere, the Internet cyberspace has a direct effect on vulnerability within the national security of each BRICS member country and the entire association as a whole.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Kartskhiya

National University of Oil and Gas "Gubkin University" (Gubkin University)

Email: arhz50@mail.ru
Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Global Risks Report,World Economic Forum 2020,URL: https://www.weforum.org/ reports/
  2. Карцхия А.А. Новые элементы национальной безопасности: национальный и международный аспект // Вопросы кибербезопасности. 2020. № 6 (40). С. 72-82;
  3. Беликова К.М. Основа правового регулирования развития и применения искусственного интеллекта в военной сфере Китая // Международное право, европейское право, Том 13. №5 2020, С.223-233;
  4. Карцхия А.А. Тенденции развития правовых институтов под влиянием пандемии: российский и зарубежный опыт //Мониторинг правоприменения.2021.№ 2 С.10-15.
  5. Keesem, L. 2019. “The Business of Organized Cybercrime: Rising Intergang Collaboration in 2018”. Security Intelligence. 20 March 2019. https://securityintelligence.com/the-business-of-organized-cybercrime-rising-intergang-collaboration-in-2018;
  6. Eoyang, M., A. Peters, I. Mehta and B. Gaskew. 2018. To Catch a Hacker: Toward a Comprehensive Strategy to Identify, Pursue, and Punish Malicious Cyber Actors. Third Way. 29 October 2018. https://www.thirdway.org/report/to-catch-a-hacker-toward-a-comprehensive-strategy-to-identify-pursue-and-punish-malicious-cyber-actors
  7. World Bank Open Data. 2019. URL:https://data.world-bank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?-most_recent_ value _ desc=true.
  8. Gibney, E.Hello Quantum World! Google Publishes Landmark Quantum Supremacy Claim. Nature. 23 October 2019. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586- 019-03213-z
  9. Herman, A. and I. Friedson. 2018. Quantum Computing: How to Address the National Security Risk. Washington, DC: Hudson Institute. April 2018. https://s3.amazonaws. com/media.hudson.org/files/publications/Quantum18FINAL4.pdf
  10. The Age of Digital Interdependence: Report of the UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation. June 2019. https://digitalcooperation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/DigitalCooperation-report-web-FINAL-1.pdf;
  11. Cihon, P. Technical Report: Standards for AI Governance: International Standards to Enable Goal Coordination in AI Research & Development. Oxford: Center for Governance of AI Future of Humanity Institute. April 2019. https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/up-loads/Standards_-FHI-Technical-Report.pdf.
  12. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2019. Digital Economy Report 2019. Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries. New York: United Nations. https://unctad.org/ en/PublicationsLibrary/der2019_en.pdf
  13. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2019. Opening Statement by Christine Lagarde to the Economic and Monetary Affairs Commit-tee of the European Parliament. 04 Sep-tember 2019. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/09/04/sp090419-Opening Statement-by-Christine-Lagarde-to-ECON-Committeeof-European-Parliament
  14. Cyber Information Sharing: Building Collective Security, World Economic Forum 2020. P.4-6 URL:www.wef.org
  15. Overview of Implementation of the Strategy for BRICS Economic Partnership in the period 2015-2020. Russian National Committee on BRICS Research and the BRICS Russia Expert Council, October 2020.
  16. CyberBRICS: Cybersecurity Regulations in the BRICS Countries.www.cyberbrics.info
  17. Patra, S.K., Krishna, V.V. Globalization of R&D and open innovation: linkages of foreign R&D centers in India. J. open innov. 1, 7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0008-6.
  18. Marthie Grobler & Joey Jansen van Vuuren (2012) Collaboration as proactive measure against cyber warfare in South Africa, African Security Review, 21:2, 61-73, doi: 10.1080/10246029.2012.654803
  19. Попова А. Новый законопроект «О защите персональных данных» - возможен ли баланс в кибериндустрии? 01.12.2020. URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/12/01/novyj_zakonoproekt_o_zaschite_personalnyh_dannyh_-_vozmozhen_li_balans_v_kiberindustrii
  20. Стукалов А.С. Европейская модель регулирования информационных отношений в сети интернет. // Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. - 2017. - № 1. - С. 129-132.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies