Some Questions of Tactico-Criminalistic Support of Anti-Corruption Compliance


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Research Objective. The article reveals the concept and content of "tactico-criminalistic support of anticorruption compliance", reveals and solves theoretical and applied problems of criminalistics support of anticorruption compliance. The scope and scale of corruption-related crime in modern Russia, including offences (crimes) of this kind in the sphere of entrepreneurship, continue to pose a threat to public and state security of the country. As a consequence, the task of minimizing legal and reputational risks, risks of regulatory sanctions due to violations of anti-corruption norms and global business standards that can lead to financial losses and the liquidation of the company as a whole comes to the fore. To solve this problem, it is proposed to investigate the use of tactical and forensic support of anti-corruption compliance to prevent corruption offences (crimes) in business structures. Conclusions. As a result of the conducted research the author comes to conclusion about efficiency of using such tactical and criminalistics techniques, methods and means as reflexive control, cognitive interview.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria Leonidovna Sharshova

Moscow state University named after M. V. Lomonosov

Email: sharshova@icloud.com
postgraduate student at the Department of Criminalistics, Faculty of Law Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Zhizhina M.V. Theory and practice of application of modern criminalistics in civil proceedings: abstract of diss. Doctor of Law / M. V. Zhizhina [Defence place: Moscow State Law Academy named after O.E. Kutafin]. - Moscow, 2017.
  2. Zerin S.N. Psychological methods of activating the memory of witnesses and victims: Methodological handbook. М., 2013.
  3. Compliance Program of the Organization: Practical Guide / V. Cherepanova. - 2nd ed. amended and supplemented. - M.: Vuzovskiy Uchebnik: INFRA-M, 2017.
  4. Makhtaev M.Sh. Problems of criminalistic provision of crime prevention: diss. D. in Law. М., 2001.
  5. Sotov A. I. The art of balancing // Compliance manager. - 2016. - no. 3.
  6. Clifford, B. R. et George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/witness investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2.
  7. Fisher, R. P. et Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interview: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
  8. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., Raymond, D. S., Jurkewich, L. M. et Warhaftig, M. L. (1987b). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15.
  9. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A. Sullivan, S., Avertissian; I. et Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12.
  10. Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62.
  11. Py, J., Ginet, m., Demarchi, S, et Ansanay-Alex, C. (2001). Une démarche psychosociale d’évaluation des procédures d’instructions. Mission de Recherche Droit et Justice, Ministère de la Justice.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies