Features of the Certain Investigative Actions Production in the Threatening to Citizens’ Life and Health Conditions (in Special Conditions)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Protecting the life and health of citizens is the most important task of the state. The process of ensuring the safety of participants in criminal proceedings provides for both general measures and measures used in the production of individual investigative actions. The purpose of writing a research paper is to summarize the provisions of the criminal procedural legislation, tactical recommendations and substantiate the need to take into account the general provisions and features of the production of individual investigative actions in the event of a threat to the life and health of its participants. The indicated general provisions are studied by the authors on the example of such investigative actions as inspection of the scene, interrogation of the suspect, accused, victim and witness, presentation for identification and verification of evidence on the spot. At the same time, the authors consider it necessary to take into account the features arising from the impact of special conditions of a social, natural, technogenic nature, which may lead to a change in the tactical conditions for organizing and conducting investigative actions in order to ensure safety and eliminate harmful consequences for participants in criminal proceedings and third parties. The objectives of the study are to analyze the problems faced by the investigator (interrogating officer) and other participants in criminal proceedings during the conduct of investigative actions at the initial and subsequent stages in the face of various threats to life and health, the mechanism for their elimination, leveling the consequences of their development before, during and at the end of the investigative action in the framework of the study and registration of its results. Conclusions: the results of such a generalization can be used in the practice of preliminary investigation bodies, for further theoretical research, preparation of scientific papers and for solving practical problems in the field of criminal proceedings under standard and special conditions, when examining the scene, interrogating various participants in criminal proceedings , verification of testimony on the spot and presentation for identification. Following the recommendations given by the authors will effectively counteract criminal elements, create safe conditions for the production of any procedural actions by the preliminary investigation bodies in special conditions.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Victoria Aleksandrovna Gauzhaeva

North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: kristyv_13@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), police colonel, associate professor of special and technical training department Nalchik, Russia

Dmitrii Michailovich Safronov

Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Email: dimsafronov@bk.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), associate professor, police colonel, deputy head of criminal procedure department Omsk, Russia

References

  1. Akkaeva H.A., Gauzhaeva V.A. Features of the technical and forensic support of the inspection of the explosion site, committed by an explosive device of home-made or industrial production // Journal of Legal and Economic Research. 2020. No. 4. S. 32-37.
  2. Akhmedshin R.L., Brager D.K. Separate problems of the practice of presenting a person for identification: forensic and criminal procedural aspects // Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. 2021. No. 472. S. 204-209.
  3. Buraeva L.A., Gauzhaeva V.A., Kardanov R.R. The need to use forensic technology when examining the scene // Eurasian legal journal. 2020. No. 3 (142). pp. 238-240.
  4. Gauzhaeva V.A., Kanokova L.Yu. Security of the scene of the incident as a set of actions that ensure the effectiveness of the inspection // Eurasian legal journal. 2021. No. 3 (154). pp. 387-388.
  5. Kankulov A.Kh. The principle of the presumption of innocence as the basis of criminal proceedings // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2021. No. 8 (200). pp. 93-94.
  6. Nagoeva M.A., Urumov A.V. The use of phonoscopy data in law enforcement practice // Criminalistics - science without borders: traditions and innovations: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. (St. Petersburg, November 26, 2020) / compilers: A.V. Bachieva, E.V. Lantukh. - St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2021. S. 197-201.
  7. Novikova L.V. On the production of video filming when checking testimony on the spot // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2021. No. 11 (203). pp. 289-291.
  8. Tambiev S.A. Criminological characteristics of the personality of an extremist // Journal of Applied Research. 2022. V. 1. No. 2. S. 56-60.
  9. Ushakov S.I. Presentation for the identification of living persons in the system of forensic tactics // New Legal Bulletin. 2020. No. 5 (19). pp. 27-29.
  10. Shamaev A.M. The role of the investigative-operational group in the investigation of terrorist crimes // Theory and practice of social development. 2015. No. 18. P. 138-140.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies