The Excess of the Perpetrator and Other Accomplices of the Crime: Gaps in Criminal Law Regulation and Prospects for Improvement

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article analyzes the features of the legislative consolidation of the concept of excess of the performer, identifies gaps in criminal law regulation and justifies the need to eliminate them. The views of scientists on the problem of the legal assessment of the excesses of the perpetrator are investigated; various opinions are compared on the issue of determining the role of causality in the crime committed by accomplices; the possibility of causing negligent consequences by the perpetrator as a result of the commission of an act not covered by the intent of other accomplices is considered.; the problems of qualification of criminal acts in which there is an unclassified intent of an accomplice are studied. Particular attention is paid to the numerous judicial errors in the qualification of the actions of accomplices in the conditions of performance excess. At the same time, the emphasis is placed on the fact that cases of excesses of other accomplices are not covered by the norms of criminal legislation. For a uniform understanding of the theory and practice of the excess of the perpetrator and other accomplices of the crime, the expediency of making changes to the legislative regulation of the institution of complicity is argued.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elena Vladimirovna Seregina

Rostov branch of Russian state University of justice

Email: seregina51@mail.ru
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate professor, Professor of criminal law Department Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Maria Sergeevna Portnova

Oktyabrsky District Court of Rostov-on-Don

Email: portnova-mari@mail.ru
secretary of the court session Rostov-on-Don, Russia

References

  1. Pudovochkin Yu.E. The doctrine of the crime and the composition of the crime. - M.: RGUP, 2017. - 221 p.
  2. Shesler A.V. Complicity in crime: monograph. - Novokuznetsk: FKOU VPO Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 2014. - 83 p.
  3. Korchagina A.Y. The excess of the perpetrator of the crime: Dis. ... cand. jurid. sciences. - M., 2004- - 196 p.
  4. The course of Soviet criminal law. Part General. Vol. 1 / Ed. Belyaev N.A., Shargorodsky M.D. - L.: Publishing House of Leningrad University, 1968- - 648 p.
  5. Telnov P.F. Responsibility for complicity in a crime. - M.: Legal literature, 1974. - 208 p.
  6. Ushakov A.V. The basis and limits of liability of accomplices in a crime under Soviet criminal law: Abstract of the dissertation of the Candidate. jurid. sciences. - M., 1971. - 17 p.
  7. Belousov I.V. The subject of proof in cases of crimes committed in complicity: monograph. - Voronezh: Voronezh Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2004. - 179 p.
  8. Cassation ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated February 20, 2014 No. 58-O14-1sp // SPS «ConsultantPlus».
  9. Trainin A.N. Selected works. - St. Petersburg: Law Center Press, 2004. - 898 p.
  10. Alekseev S. V. Problems of criminal responsibility for crimes committed in the group: Abstract of the dissertation of the candidate. jurid. sciences'. - Tambov, 2006. - 22 p.
  11. Appeal ruling of the Fourth Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction dated 02.03.2021 in case No.55-56/2021 // SPS «ConsultantPlus».
  12. Kapinus O.S., Obrazhiev K.V. The excess of the perpetrator and other accomplices of the crime: problems of qualification // Criminal law. 2018. No.2. - pp. 42-51.
  13. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 29 of December 27, 2002 «On judicial practice in cases of theft, robbery and robbery» // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2002. No.5.
  14. Klimenko Yu.A. Rules for the qualification of crimes committed in complicity // Journal of Russian Law. 2017. No. 4. - pp. 112 - 121.
  15. Klimenko Yu.A. The excess of an accomplice in a crime // Judge. 2016. No. 4. - pp. 22-24.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies