Comment on the Paradoxes of Scientific, Practical and Official Interpretations and Definitions of Legal Norms Using the Example of the Criminal Code of the Azerbaijan Republic

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article is devoted to one of the most important issues of legal science - the interpretation of legal norms. Based on the study of doctrinal and official interpretation materials, problematic issues of a theoretical and practical nature are revealed, which negatively affect the quality of the results of the considering scientific and practical activity.

According to the authors of this article, the main reasons for the pressing problems of interpretation of legal norms lie in the destructive nature of the modern methodology of legal science, which we inherited as the “legacy” of the Soviet legal school. As a result of the research, reasoned proposals were formulated to enrich and deepen the fundamental foundations of the methodology of legal science.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mubariz Mustafayev

Baku State University; Center for Forensic Expertise under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan

Author for correspondence.
Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6220-3493

Dr.Sci.(Law), Professor of the Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Science

Azerbaijan, Baku; Baku

Aygun Shahbanova

Baku State University; Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan

Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1482-621X
SPIN-code: 3894-5433

Dr.Philos.(Law), Junior Counselor of Justice, freelance teacher, Chief Consultant of the General Department of Legislation

Azerbaijan, Baku; Baku

Elvin Aliyev

Center for Forensic Expertise under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan

Email: aygun.shahbanova@justice.gov.az

doctoral student

Azerbaijan, Baku

References

  1. Alekseev S.S. The line of law. M., 2006.p. 50.
  2. Theory of State and Law. Edited by N.I. Matuzova and A.V. Malko. M.: Norma-Infra, 2015, 639 p.
  3. Mustafaev M.Kh. Poverty of methodology in modern political and legal research. Baku, Qanun, 2005, No. 1.
  4. Marchenko M.N., Deryabina E.M. Theory of state and law of Russia. Vol.2. M.: Prospekt Publishing House, 2021, 448 p.
  5. Tikhonravov V.N. Philosophy of law. M., 1998, p. 53
  6. Syrykh V.M. History and methodology of legal science. M.: Infra-M., 2013, 464 p.
  7. Kerimov D.A. Philosophy of Law, M. 2013.
  8. Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Philosophy. Moscow, 2021, p.440-444.
  9. Berdyaev N.A. Free spirit philosophy. M.: AST, 2011, 693 p.
  10. Kirillov V.I., Starchenko A.A. Logics. M., 1998., p. 14.
  11. Criminal law. A common part. Ed. B.V. Zdravomyslova. M.: Lawyer, 1996, 512 p.
  12. Grishaev M.I., Krieger G.A. Complicity in criminal law. M. 1959, p. 140.
  13. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/organizatsiya-prestupnogo-soobschestva-prestupnoy-organizatsii-st-210-uk-rf-problemy-primeneniya-i-otvetstvennosti/viewer
  14. Zhalinsky A.E. Modern German criminal law. M.: Prospekt Publishing House, 2006, 506 p.
  15. Criminal law of Russia. Parts General and Special: textbook / Ed. A.V. Brilliantova - 2nd ed., revised. and additional – Moscow: Prospekt, 2018, 1184 p.
  16. Razzeev D.N. Kant's teleological ontology. SPb. Science, 2010, p.66.
  17. Mustafaev M.Kh. Adversarial form and objective truth // Black holes in Russian legislation. M. 2007, No. 1, pp. 187-193.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download