Problematic Aspects of the Use of Preventive Measures in Criminal Proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

It is difficult to overestimate the importance of the institution of preventive measures in the implementation of the goals and objectives of the criminal procedure legislation. Combining several functions at the same time, the application of measures of procedural influence on a person pursues goals aimed at protecting the interests of society and the state, expressed in the need to prevent, prevent and combat crime.

The absence of a legal interpretation of preventive measures causes the presence of many definitions in the doctrine. At the same time, the unanimity of opinions of scientists boils down to the fact that preventive measures are a kind of procedural measures and are associated with psychological, physical and other impact on the suspect and the accused, and in some cases, the restriction of fundamental human rights and freedoms. In this regard, the author substantiates the expediency of introducing a legal definition of a preventive measure or concretizing it in the definition of a specific measure.

The article is devoted to the consideration of the specifics of the application of preventive measures in criminal procedural legal relations. The author analyzes the purpose of the application of these measures, the functions performed by these measures, highlights the signs of preventive measures in criminal proceedings, as well as some problematic aspects of their application in the process of investigating criminal cases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ruslan A. Tembotov

Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: Lel4993@mail.ru

Lecturer, Department of Law Enforcement Organization North Caucasian Institute for Advanced Studies (branch)

Russian Federation, Nalchik, KBR

References

  1. Barabash A.S. Goals and grounds for choosing a measure of restraint in criminal proceedings // Actual problems of Russian law. 2015. No. 12.
  2. Enikeev Z.D. Measures of procedural coercion in the system of means of prosecution and defense. Ufa, 1978.
  3. Kankulov A.Kh. Problems of applying the prohibition of certain actions as a new measure of restraint in Russian criminal proceedings // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 4.
  4. Reznik G.M. Criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. M., 2019.
  5. Rogava I.G. Actual problems of the application of preventive measures in criminal proceedings // International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. No. 1-2.
  6. Romashova M.V. Issues of the application of preventive measures in criminal proceedings // Young scientist. 2019. No. 4 (242).
  7. Semelkina P.D. Bail as a preventive measure // Young scientist. 2021. No. 15 (357).
  8. Simagina N.A. Measures of restraint in criminal proceedings // Investigation of crimes: problems and ways to solve them. 2019. No. 3 (25).
  9. Smirnova O.V., Yanin M.G. Definition of the concept of "preventive measure" in the criminal process // Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law. 2020. No. 2.
  10. Surtsev A.V., Shapov E.S. Prohibition of certain actions in criminal proceedings // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 4.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies