Some Problems of Assessing the Admissibility and Reliability of Evidence in Criminal Cases

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The Purpose of the study. The article discusses the problems of evaluating evidence according to the criteria of admissibility and reliability. Modern law enforcement practice devoted to practical problems of evidence assessment is analyzed. The analysis of the formed judicial practice of recognizing as admissible evidence, evidence obtained in violation of the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, in view of minor violations of the procedure established by criminal procedure legislation for their collection and consolidation by the investigator (inquirer). The position is justified that the proof cannot be reliable in part or in part, it is impossible to characterize the proof as probable or reliable in one part or another, to a certain extent.

Conclusions.  As a result of the conducted research, the authors conclude that "admissibility" and "reliability" as properties of evidence should be considered in close relationship with each other, since these concepts together make it possible to give a full assessment of the circumstances to be proved in a criminal case. Admissibility as a formal legal property and reliability as a substantive property give information that is considered in the course of a criminal case the possibility of their use as evidence in making procedural decisions. Information of evidentiary value must be obtained in accordance with the procedural procedure for the production of investigative and other procedural actions, any violations of the requirements of the criminal procedure legislation regarding the procedure for collecting and securing evidence should lead to the recognition of evidence as inadmissible.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Eduard Vinokurov

I.D. Putilin Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: VinokurovEA@yandex.ru

Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure

俄罗斯联邦, Belgorod

Yuri Kovtun

Belgorod State National Research University

Email: belad@yandex.ru

Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Process at the Law Institute

俄罗斯联邦, Belgorod

参考

  1. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 19.12.2017 №. 51 On the practice of applying legislation when considering criminal cases in the court of first instance (general procedure) // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. – № 3. - March. – 2018.
  2. Voskoboinik I.O. Some aspects of the property of admissibility of evidence in criminal cases/I.O. Voskoboinik//Russian-Asian legal journal. - Barnaul, 2021. – №1. - P.8-11.
  3. Iovin A.A. To the question of the concept and content of the admissibility of evidence /A.A. Iovin// Achievements of science and education. - Krasnodar, 2021. – №7(79). - P.42-43.
  4. Kapustina L.K. Ratio of admissibility and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings/L.K. Kapustina//Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. - Kazan, 2019. – №3(37). - P.386-390.
  5. Kornakova S.V. To the discussion on the properties of relatability, admissibility and reliability of criminal procedural evidence/S.V. Kornakova//Russian law. - Irkutsk, 2021. – №9(178). – Pp.67-76.
  6. Lebedev N.Yu., Stepanov S.A. Reliability and sufficiency of evidence in criminal proceedings: the concept, meaning and problems of establishment / N.Yu. Lebedev, S.A. Stepanov // Law and law. Novosibirsk, 2022. – №.4. – P.146-150.
  7. Ovsyannikov I.V. The problem of reliability of evidence in the evidentiary law of Russia / I.V. Ovsyannikov // Modern law. – 2004 – №. 7. – P. 35-41

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##